首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同曝气工艺对佛山水道水质DO和COD的影响
引用本文:廖丽华,彭闪江,陶涛,李尔. 不同曝气工艺对佛山水道水质DO和COD的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2008, 0(Z1)
作者姓名:廖丽华  彭闪江  陶涛  李尔
作者单位:佛山市环境监测中心站;中国科学院广州地球化学研究所;华中科技大学环境科学与工程学院;
摘    要:通过现场模拟试验,探讨了雾化管、射流器、橡胶坝和叶轮4种曝气工艺对改善佛山水道水质的影响。结果表明,4种工艺的平均复氧效率(14.3%~36.6%)和对COD的平均去除率(9.6%~24.6%)显示了较大差异。橡胶坝和雾化管曝气工艺的复氧效率较高,而叶轮和射流器曝气工艺则对COD去除有较好效果。在曝气并结合混凝的对照试验中,投加絮凝剂有助于提高水中DO和去除COD。

关 键 词:曝气  DO  COD  佛山水道  

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT AERATION TECHNIQUES ON DO AND COD OF WATER QUALITY IN FOSHAN RIVER
Liao LihuaPeng ShanjiangTao Tao Li Er. THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT AERATION TECHNIQUES ON DO AND COD OF WATER QUALITY IN FOSHAN RIVER[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2008, 0(Z1)
Authors:Liao LihuaPeng ShanjiangTao Tao Li Er
Affiliation:Liao Lihua(Foshan Environmental Monitoring Centre Foshan 528000)Peng Shanjiang(Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry,the Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou 510650)Tao Tao Li Er(School of Environmental Science , Engineering,Huazhong University of Science , Technology Wuhan 430074)
Abstract:Based on spot simulative experiments,it was explored that the impacts of the four different aeration techniques(atomizing pipe,rubber dam,ejector and impeller aeration) on improving water quality of Foshan River.Results showed that average aeration efficiency(from 14.3% to 36.6%)and removal rate of COD(from 9.6% to 24.6%)presented great differences in four techniques.Atomizing pipe and rubber dam aeration techniques had a higher aeration efficiency.Impeller and ejector aeration techniques had a good effect ...
Keywords:aeration DO COD Foshan River  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号