首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

典型脱硫工艺对燃煤锅炉烟气颗粒物的影响
引用本文:张进生,吴建会,吕瑞鹤,宋丹林,黄凤霞,张裕芬,冯银厂. 典型脱硫工艺对燃煤锅炉烟气颗粒物的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(10): 4455-4461. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202003193
作者姓名:张进生  吴建会  吕瑞鹤  宋丹林  黄凤霞  张裕芬  冯银厂
作者单位:南开大学环境科学与工程学院,国家环境保护城市空气颗粒物污染防治重点实验室,天津 300071,成都市环境科学研究院,成都 610072
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0208501);天津市科技计划项目(18ZXSZSF00160)
摘    要:脱硫是燃煤锅炉的重要除污环节,为探究脱硫工艺对烟气颗粒物的影响,选取4台不同脱硫工艺(石灰石/石膏法、炉内喷钙法、氨法和双碱法)的燃煤锅炉,利用再悬浮采样法和稀释通道采样法分别采集脱硫前后烟气颗粒物样品,并测定颗粒物中的水溶性离子、无机元素和碳组分.结果表明,脱硫剂对烟气PM2.5的组分构成产生影响,烟气经过石灰石/石膏法脱硫后,PM2.5中的Ca由5.1%提高至24.8%;经过氨法脱硫后,PM2.5中NH+4的质量分数由0.8%提高到7.3%;双碱法脱硫则使烟气PM2.5中Na由0.9%提高到1.7%.湿法和干法脱硫工艺的作用显著不同,湿法脱硫排放颗粒物的离子含量较高,经过石灰石/石膏法和氨法脱硫,PM2.5中SO4 2-的质量分数分别由2.0%和6.7%提高到9.6%和11.9%,Cl-分别由0.4%和1.2%提高到3.8%和5.2%,而Cr、 Pb、 Cu、 Ti...

关 键 词:烟气脱硫  燃煤锅炉  颗粒物  成分谱  碳组分
收稿时间:2020-03-18
修稿时间:2020-04-17

Influence of Typical Desulfurization Process on Flue Gas Particulate Matter of Coal-fired Boilers
ZHANG Jin-sheng,WU Jian-hui,L,#; Rui-he,SONG Dan-lin,HUANG Feng-xi,ZHANG Yu-fen,FENG Yin-chang. Influence of Typical Desulfurization Process on Flue Gas Particulate Matter of Coal-fired Boilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2020, 41(10): 4455-4461. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202003193
Authors:ZHANG Jin-sheng,WU Jian-hui,L&#   Rui-he,SONG Dan-lin,HUANG Feng-xi,ZHANG Yu-fen,FENG Yin-chang
Affiliation:State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;Chengdu Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China
Abstract:As flue gas desulfurization (FGD) was one of the most important purification processes of coal-fired boilers, we selected four boilers, which were equipped with wet limestone, furnace calcium injection, ammonia-based, and double-alkali FGDs, to research the influence of FGDs on the flue particulate matter (PM). The flue PM before and after the FGD were sampled using laboratory resuspension and dilution tunnel sampling methods, respectively, and the PM was analyzed for its chemical composition (i.e., ions, elements, and carbon). The results showed that the types of desulfurizers could influence the composition of the flue PM. After passing through the wet limestone, ammonia-based, and double-alkali FGDs, the proportion of Ca, NH4+, and Na in PM2.5 increased from 5.1% to 24.8%, from 0.8% to 7.3%, and from 0.9% to 1.7%, respectively. The influence of wet and dry FGDs on the flue PM were different. The fraction of ions in the PM emitted from the wet FGD were higher than those from the dry FGD. The proportion of SO42- in the flue PM2.5 increased from 2.0% and 6.7% to 9.6% and 11.9% using the wet limestone and ammonia-based FGDs, respectively, and Cl- increased from 0.4% and 1.2% to 3.8% and 5.2%. In addition, the amount of heavy metals (e.g., Cr, Pb, Cu, Ti, and Mn) in PM2.5 declined after the wet FGDs. The PM2.5 emitted from the dry FGD boiler was richer in crustal elements, such as Al, Si, and Fe, than that from the wet FGDs. The wet FGDs also effected the carbonaceous components of the flue PM. After passing through the wet limestone and ammonia-based FGDs, the proportion of elemental carbon in the flue PM2.5 decreased from 6.1% to 0.9% and from 3.6% to 0.7% respectively, but the organic carbon content did not decrease.
Keywords:flue gas desulfurization  coal-fired boiler  particulate matter  chemical composition profile  carbonaceous components
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号