首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A comparative evaluation of the regulation of GM crops or products containing dsRNA and suggested improvements to risk assessments
Institution:1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand;2. Centre for Integrated Research in Biosafety, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand;3. Crop Science Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil;4. Health and the Environment, School of the Environment, Flinders University, Australia;5. Institute of Health and Environmental Research, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Abstract:Changing the nature, kind and quantity of particular regulatory-RNA molecules through genetic engineering can create biosafety risks. While some genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are intended to produce new regulatory-RNA molecules, these may also arise in other GMOs not intended to express them. To characterise, assess and then mitigate the potential adverse effects arising from changes to RNA requires changing current approaches to food or environmental risk assessments of GMOs. We document risk assessment advice offered to government regulators in Australia, New Zealand and Brazil during official risk evaluations of GM plants for use as human food or for release into the environment (whether for field trials or commercial release), how the regulator considered those risks, and what that experience teaches us about the GMO risk assessment framework. We also suggest improvements to the process.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号