Spatial uncertainty analysis of population models |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6036, USA;2. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR, USA;1. Freshwater Fisheries Research Institute of Jiangsu Province, 79 Chating East Street, Nanjing 210017, China;2. College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, 999 Huchenghuan Road, Shanghai 201306, China;3. Jiangsu Agri-animal Husbandry Vocational College, 8 Fenghuang East Street, Taizhou 225300, China;1. Institute of Arid Zones, Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Chekhov Street, 41, 344006 Rostov-on-Don, Russia;2. Vorovich Institute of Mathematics, Mechanics and Computer Sciences, Southern Federal University, Stachki street, 200/1, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia;1. Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Oregon State University, 270 Peavy Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA;2. Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This paper describes an approach for conducting spatial uncertainty analysis of spatial population models, and illustrates the ecological consequences of spatial uncertainty for landscapes with different properties. Spatial population models typically simulate birth, death, and migration on an input map that describes habitat. Typically, only a single “reference” map is available, but we can imagine that a collection of other, slightly different, maps could be drawn to represent a particular species’ habitat. As a first approximation, our approach assumes that spatial uncertainty (i.e., the variation among values assigned to a location by such a collection of maps) is constrained by characteristics of the reference map, regardless of how the map was produced. Our approach produces lower levels of uncertainty than alternative methods used in landscape ecology because we condition our alternative landscapes on local properties of the reference map. Simulated spatial uncertainty was higher near the borders of patches. Consequently, average uncertainty was highest for reference maps with equal proportions of suitable and unsuitable habitat, and no spatial autocorrelation. We used two population viability models to evaluate the ecological consequences of spatial uncertainty for landscapes with different properties. Spatial uncertainty produced larger variation among predictions of a spatially explicit model than those of a spatially implicit model. Spatially explicit model predictions of final female population size varied most among landscapes with enough clustered habitat to allow persistence. In contrast, predictions of population growth rate varied most among landscapes with only enough clustered habitat to support a small population, i.e., near a spatially mediated extinction threshold. We conclude that spatial uncertainty has the greatest effect on persistence when the amount and arrangement of suitable habitat are such that habitat capacity is near the minimum required for persistence. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|