首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

化学淋洗联合电动技术修复重金属污染土壤的效果及其机制
引用本文:马强,卫泽斌,吴启堂. 化学淋洗联合电动技术修复重金属污染土壤的效果及其机制[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(3): 1668-1677
作者姓名:马强  卫泽斌  吴启堂
作者单位:华南农业大学资源环境学院,广州 510642;南华大学资源环境与安全工程学院,衡阳 421001;华南农业大学资源环境学院,广州 510642
基金项目:广东省特支计划本土创新团队项目(2019BT02L218);广东省科技计划项目(2018B030324003)
摘    要:采用化学淋洗与电动技术联合修复重金属污染土壤,以明确其效果及其机制.试验选择了5种化学淋洗剂FeCl3、 Fe(NO3)3、 KCl、 KNO3和HCl溶液,分析比较Fe3+、 K+、 H+和Cl-对土壤中4种重金属(Cd、 Pb、 Cu和Zn)的去除效果,其后,对化学淋洗后的土壤进行垂直电动修复,研究化学淋洗对重金属污染土壤电动修复去除效率的影响.结果表明,Fe3+、 K+、 H+和Cl-对土壤中4种重金属的淋洗效果不同,对于Cd和Zn, H+去除效果最好,对于Pb和Cu, Fe3+去除效果最好.整体上比较,对于土壤中Cd、 Pb和Cu的去除,化学淋洗剂FeCl3和Fe(NO3)3去除效果最好.对于土壤中Zn的去除,...

关 键 词:化学淋洗  电动修复  重金属  污染土壤  作用机制
收稿时间:2022-04-22
修稿时间:2022-06-05

Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Chemical Leaching Combined with Electrokinetic Technology on the Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil
MA Qiang,WEI Ze-bin,WU Qi-tang. Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Chemical Leaching Combined with Electrokinetic Technology on the Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2023, 44(3): 1668-1677
Authors:MA Qiang  WEI Ze-bin  WU Qi-tang
Affiliation:College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
Abstract:In this study, chemical leaching and electrokinetic technology were used to remediate heavy metal contaminated soil to elucidate its effectiveness and mechanisms. Chemical leaching agents of FeCl3, Fe(NO3)3, KCl, KNO3, and HCl solutions were selected, and the effects of Fe3+, K+, H+, and Cl- on four heavy metal (Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn) removals were compared and analyzed. Then, the influence of the speciation of heavy metals in soil after chemical leaching on the electrokinetic remediation efficiency was studied. The results showed that Fe3+, K+, H+, and Cl- had different effects on the four heavy metal removals; for Cd and Zn, the removal effect of H+was the most effective, but for Pb and Cu, the effect of Fe3+ was the most obvious. On the whole, FeCl3 and Fe(NO3)3 showed the best removal effect for Cd, Pb, and Cu. For the removal of Zn from the soil, the difference in the removal effect of the five leaching agents was not obvious. In comparison with that of FeCl3 and Fe(NO3)3, the HCl solution had a moderate removal effect on the four heavy metals in the soil, and the neutral salts KCl and KNO3 had little removal effect on the four heavy metals. Especially for Cd and Cu, KCl and KNO3 addition significantly increased the removal of heavy metals through the subsequent electrokinetic remediation. After the chemical leaching, electrokinetic remediation could make heavy metals in the topsoil (0-10 cm) migrate downward and enrich the 10-20 cm and 20-30 cm soil layers, which requires further studies to resolve.
Keywords:chemical leaching  electrokinetic remediation  heavy metal  contaminated soil  mechanism
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号