首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

CSTR水力学模型数值求解方法探讨
引用本文:邓义祥,富 国,郑丙辉,卢少勇.CSTR水力学模型数值求解方法探讨[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(2):40-43.
作者姓名:邓义祥  富 国  郑丙辉  卢少勇
作者单位:中国环境科学研究院,北京 100012
摘    要:CSTR模型是河流水质模拟的常用模型之一,其中水力学模型是影响CSTR模型数值稳定性的关键因素,但迄今为止对CSTR水力学模型数值稳定性鲜有充分的讨论. 以赣江朝阳水厂至八一桥北段为例,采用实测数据,分单箱积分和整体积分2种方式,讨论了Runge-Kutta-Felberg方法(RKF)、经典四阶Runge-Kutta方法(RK4)和二级四阶隐式Runge-Kutta方法(RK2)的数值稳定性、模拟精度和时间效率. 结果表明,与国际上目前常用的单箱积分相比,整体积分具有更好的稳定性. 3种Runge-Kutta方法的稳定性排序是RKF
关 键 词:CSTR模型    数值稳定性    积分精度    时间效率
文章编号:1001-6929(2008)02-0040-04
收稿时间:2007/7/2 0:00:00
修稿时间:2007年7月2日

Discussion on the Numerical Solution of CSTR Hydrological Model
DENG Yi-xiang,FU Guo,ZHENG Bing-hui and LU Shao-yong.Discussion on the Numerical Solution of CSTR Hydrological Model[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2008,21(2):40-43.
Authors:DENG Yi-xiang  FU Guo  ZHENG Bing-hui and LU Shao-yong
Institution:Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Abstract:The Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Model is one of the most commonly used river water quality models in the world. The hydrological model plays a key role in the model's numerical stability, but this problem has not been fully discussed until now. With the river section from Chaoyang Water Plant to BayiBridge in Ganjiang River as an example, based on the field observations, the numerical stability, accuracy and efficiency of Runge-Kutta-Felberg (RKF), classical Runge-Kutta (RK4) and implicit Runge-Kutta (RK2) were compared by tank-by-tank integration and whole river integration respectively. It shows that although the tank-by-tank method is used much extensively, the stability of the whole integration is superior to the tank-by-tank integration. The stability of the three Runge-Kutta methods is in the order of RKF
Keywords:CSTR model  numerical stability  integration accuracy  efficiency
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号