首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A typology of time‐scale mismatches and behavioral interventions to diagnose and solve conservation problems
Authors:Robyn S Wilson  David J Hardisty  Rebecca S Epanchin‐Niell  Michael C Runge  Kathryn L Cottingham  Dean L Urban  Lynn A Maguire  Alan Hastings  Peter J Mumby  Debra PC Peters
Institution:1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, U.S.A.;2. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;3. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.;4. U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, U.S.A.;5. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, U.S.A.;6. Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A.;7. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA, U.S.A.;8. ARC Centre for Excellence for Reef Studies and School of Biological Sciences, Townsville, Qld, Australia;9. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM, U.S.A.
Abstract:Ecological systems often operate on time scales significantly longer or shorter than the time scales typical of human decision making, which causes substantial difficulty for conservation and management in socioecological systems. For example, invasive species may move faster than humans can diagnose problems and initiate solutions, and climate systems may exhibit long‐term inertia and short‐term fluctuations that obscure learning about the efficacy of management efforts in many ecological systems. We adopted a management‐decision framework that distinguishes decision makers within public institutions from individual actors within the social system, calls attention to the ways socioecological systems respond to decision makers’ actions, and notes institutional learning that accrues from observing these responses. We used this framework, along with insights from bedeviling conservation problems, to create a typology that identifies problematic time‐scale mismatches occurring between individual decision makers in public institutions and between individual actors in the social or ecological system. We also considered solutions that involve modifying human perception and behavior at the individual level as a means of resolving these problematic mismatches. The potential solutions are derived from the behavioral economics and psychology literature on temporal challenges in decision making, such as the human tendency to discount future outcomes at irrationally high rates. These solutions range from framing environmental decisions to enhance the salience of long‐term consequences, to using structured decision processes that make time scales of actions and consequences more explicit, to structural solutions aimed at altering the consequences of short‐sighted behavior to make it less appealing. Additional application of these tools and long‐term evaluation measures that assess not just behavioral changes but also associated changes in ecological systems are needed.
Keywords:decision theory  economics  psychology  socioecological systems  temporal lags  disminuciones temporales  economí  a  psicologí  a  sistemas socio‐ecoló  gicos  teorí  a de decisió  n
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号