首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

大尺度生态干扰风险评估技术方法及应用研究
引用本文:高吉喜,蔡明勇,张新胜,申文明,史雪威,肖如林. 大尺度生态干扰风险评估技术方法及应用研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(11): 5274-5281
作者姓名:高吉喜  蔡明勇  张新胜  申文明  史雪威  肖如林
作者单位:生态环境部卫星环境应用中心, 北京 100094
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0506606);成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室开放基金资助项目(SKLGP2020K005)
摘    要:为实现大尺度生态干扰高风险区域的快速、有效识别,从生态易损性、干扰易达性和资源易引性三个方面选取了9个指标,构建了生态干扰风险评估指标体系和评估模型,形成了完整的大尺度生态干扰评估技术与方法.利用该技术方法,本文评估分析了全国国土空间生态干扰风险状况、空间分布格局及其成因,并结合2017~2019年全国自然保护区人类活动监测数据和《全国主体功能区规划》中生态脆弱性评价结果对生态干扰风险评估结果进行了精度分析.结果显示:超过90%的自然保护区人类活动都集中在评估得到的中高风险区域;全国生态干扰风险主要以中风险为主、低风险次之、再次是较低风险、较高和高风险区域面积最少;其中较高和高风险区域主要分布在我国中西部和东北部的秦岭、祁连山、三江源和内蒙古草原等区域,生态干扰风险空间分布格局与生态系统结构与功能状况、地形与交通条件、资源潜力等因素具有较强相关性.

关 键 词:生态干扰风险指数  生态易损性  干扰易达性  资源易引性  人类干扰活动  全国生态干扰风险等级  
收稿时间:2021-03-05

Research on the method and application of large-scale ecological disturbance risk assessment
GAO Ji-xi,CAI Ming-yong,ZHANG Xin-sheng,SHEN Wen-ming,SHI Xue-wei,XIAO Ru-lin. Research on the method and application of large-scale ecological disturbance risk assessment[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 41(11): 5274-5281
Authors:GAO Ji-xi  CAI Ming-yong  ZHANG Xin-sheng  SHEN Wen-ming  SHI Xue-wei  XIAO Ru-lin
Affiliation:Ministry of Ecology and Environment Center for Satellite Application on Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China
Abstract:To realize the rapid and effective identification of high risk areas of large-scale ecological disturbance, This research selected 9 indicators from three aspects of "ecological vulnerability (EV)", "accessibility to disturbance (AD)" and "easy-attractiveness of resources (RE)", and constructed the index system and evaluation model of ecological disturbance risk assessment, forming a complete large-scale ecological disturbance assessment technology and method. Using this technology and method, the risk status of the national land space ecological disturbance, the spatial distribution pattern and its causes were evaluated and analyzed, and the 2017~2019 national nature reserves human activity monitoring data and ecological vulnerability result in the National Planning for Major Function Zones were used to analyze the accuracy of the ecological disturbance risk assessment results. The results showed that more than 90% of human activities in nature reserves were concentrated in the medium and high risk areas, The national ecological disturbance risk was mainly intermediate, followed by low and relatively low, and high and relatively high areas were the least. The high and relatively high risk areas were mainly distributed in the west-central and northeast regions such as the Qinling Mountains, Qilian Mountains, Sanjiangyuan, and Inner Mongolia grasslands. The spatial distribution characteristics of ecological disturbance risk had a strong correlation with factors such as the structure and function of the ecosystem, topography, traffic conditions, and resource potential.
Keywords:risk index of ecological disturbance  ecological vulnerability  accessibility to disturbance  easy-attractiveness of resources  human disturbance activities  national ecological disturbance risk level  
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号