首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于油提取的土壤与沉积物中微塑料的分离方法
引用本文:董明潭,罗泽娇,邢新丽,张俏俏,孙越.基于油提取的土壤与沉积物中微塑料的分离方法[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(6):1522-1529.
作者姓名:董明潭  罗泽娇  邢新丽  张俏俏  孙越
作者单位:1.中国地质大学(武汉)环境学院, 湖北 武汉 430078
基金项目:国家科技攻关计划项目(No.2017YFD0801005);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41672246);湖北省技术创新专项项目(No.2017ACA092)
摘    要:微塑料作为一种全球性新兴污染物受到学界与社会的广泛关注.由于土壤和沉积物中的微塑料难以分离提取,目前关于微塑料的研究主要集中于水体中,而关于土壤与沉积物中微塑料的丰度、分布与环境行为尚不清楚,迫切需要一种经济、快速、可靠的前处理手段将微塑料从土壤或沉积物中分离出来进而开展检测与监测工作.油提取法不同于传统密度浮选法,其利用塑料的亲油性,使用植物油代替密度液分离土壤与沉积物中的微塑料.通过油提取法在砂土(二长花岗岩风化层残坡积物)、壤土(菜地黄棕壤)、黏土(稻田水稻土)、泥质湖泊沉积物中获得的总加标回收率分别为88.3%±6.29%、88.3%±3.82%、90.0%±2.50%、90.8%±1.44%.其中,对于密度浮选法较难提取的聚氯乙烯(PVC)、聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET),其回收率分别为93.3%±11.6%(壤土)、96.7%±5.77%(壤土).植物油的加入会对后续微塑料的光谱表征识别产生影响,但可通过无水乙醇冲洗去除,与拉曼光谱仍具有良好的兼容性.利用该方法开展的实地研究获得黄冈市残坡积物(砂土)、武汉市菜地(壤土)、武汉市水稻田(黏土)、武汉市东湖泥质湖泊沉积物中的微塑料丰度分别为1 679、1 612、1 766、7 629个/kg.研究显示,油提取是当下密度浮选技术的可替代方案. 

关 键 词:油提取    微塑料    土壤    沉积物
收稿时间:2019/7/9 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/9/27 0:00:00

Separation of Microplastics in Soils and Sediments with Oil Extraction Protocol
DONG Mingtan,LUO Zejiao,XING Xinli,ZHANG Qiaoqiao,SUN Yue.Separation of Microplastics in Soils and Sediments with Oil Extraction Protocol[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2020,33(6):1522-1529.
Authors:DONG Mingtan  LUO Zejiao  XING Xinli  ZHANG Qiaoqiao  SUN Yue
Institution:1.School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China2.School of LiSiguang, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Abstract:Microplastics have received extensive attention as an emerging global pollutant in recent years. However, few studies have focused on the abundance, spatial distribution and environmental behavior of microplastics in soils and sediments because it is hard to separate and extract them from soils and sediments matrix. It is imperative to develop an economical, fast, and reliable pretreatment method to isolate microplastics from soils or sediments for detection and monitoring. Oil extraction protocol uses the plant oil to extract microplastics from soils and sediments. It differs from traditional density flotation techniques in that it uses the lipophilic properties of plastics rather than the density differences between plastics and solution for flotation. The total spike recovery of oil extraction in sandy soil (talus material of monzonitic granite), loam (yellow-brown soil of vegetable field), clay (paddy soil) and lake muddy sediments were 88.30%±6.29%, 88.30%±3.82%, 90.00%±2.50% and 90.80%±1.44%, respectively. For PVC and PET which were difficult to extract by density separation methods, the recovery rates of oil extraction protocol were 93.9%±11.6% and 96.7%±5.77% (loam), respectively. The addition of oil interfered with the spectral analysis of the microplastics, but it could be removed by washing with absolute ethanol, and the samples could be analyzed by Raman spectroscopy. Our analysis determined that the microplastics abundances of the talus material (sandy soil) in Huanggang City, vegetable field (loam) in Wuhan City, paddy field (clay) in Wuhan City and lake sediments in Dong Lake of Wuhan City were 1679, 1612, 1766 and 7629 items/kg, respectively. This studies shows that the oil extraction method is an alternative to the current density flotation technology.
Keywords:oil extraction protocol  microplastics  soils  sediments
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号