首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

室内人体行走引起颗粒物再悬浮的试验研究
引用本文:蔡宁宁,王宝庆,胡新鑫,唐真真,姜卓,杨家豪,李坤键.室内人体行走引起颗粒物再悬浮的试验研究[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(3):766-771.
作者姓名:蔡宁宁  王宝庆  胡新鑫  唐真真  姜卓  杨家豪  李坤键
作者单位:南开大学环境科学与工程学院,天津 300350;南开大学经济学院,天津 300071
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(No.21777076)
摘    要:室内人员活动是室内颗粒物再悬浮的重要因素,研究室内颗粒物再悬浮对评估室内空气质量有重要意义.以南开大学津南校区某公共教室为研究区域,通过现场试验研究了室内地面不同积尘负荷下,人员行走引起的PM2.5再悬浮浓度及其扩散速率.结果表明:①不同时间间隔内的室内地面总颗粒积尘负荷不同,时间间隔为3、7、15 d时,室内PM2.5积尘负荷分别为0.11、0.18、0.30 g/m2.②室内地面不同总颗粒积尘负荷下,在室内中心过道处行走时引起的PM2.5再悬浮浓度约1 min后达到最高值,PM2.5再悬浮浓度达到最高值的时间与地面不同总颗粒积尘负荷的关系不明显.③随着室内地面总颗粒积尘负荷的增加,人体行走引起的PM2.5再悬浮浓度也会增加.当室内PM2.5积尘负荷为0.30 g/m2时,行走路径中游坐姿1.1 m处与站姿呼吸平面1.5 m处的PM2.5再悬浮浓度平均值分别为3.03、2.68 μg/m3,约是室内PM2.5积尘负荷为0.18与0.11 g/m2时引起的PM2.5再悬浮浓度平均值的2~3倍.④利用颗粒物传输模型对PM2.5再悬浮进行量化分析发现,室内地面不同总颗粒积尘负荷的大小与PM2.5再悬浮分数无关,PM2.5再悬浮分数为2.2×10-8;室内PM2.5积尘负荷为0.11、0.18、0.30 g/m2时,行走引起的再悬浮PM2.5扩散速率分别为7.62×10-11、1.25×10-10、2.08×10-10 kg/s.研究显示,地面积尘负荷的大小会影响人体行走时颗粒物的扩散速率与室内PM2.5浓度. 

关 键 词:室内空气质量  人体行走  PM2.5  再悬浮分数  扩散速率
收稿时间:2020/2/17 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/8/8 0:00:00

Experimental Study of Human Walking-Induced Indoor Particle Resuspension
CAI Ningning,WANG Baoqing,HU Xinxin,TANG Zhenzhen,JIANG Zhuo,YANG Jiahao,LI Kunjian.Experimental Study of Human Walking-Induced Indoor Particle Resuspension[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(3):766-771.
Authors:CAI Ningning  WANG Baoqing  HU Xinxin  TANG Zhenzhen  JIANG Zhuo  YANG Jiahao  LI Kunjian
Institution:1.College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China2.School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
Abstract:Indoor human activity is an important factor of indoor particulate matter resuspension, and the study of indoor particulate matter resuspension is of great significance to the evaluation of indoor air quality. A public classroom in Jinnan campus of Nankai University was taken as the research area. The resuspension concentration and diffusion rate of the human walking-induced indoor PM2.5 resuspension under different dust loads of indoor ground were studied by field experiments. The results show that: (1) When the time interval is 3, 7 and 15 days, the indoor PM2.5 dust load is 0.11, 0.18 and 0.30 g/m2, respectively. (2) The concentration of the human walking-induced indoor PM2.5 resuspension in the indoor center aisle reaches the maximum value at about 1 min for different dust loads of indoor ground. The relationship between the time when PM2.5 resuspension concentration reaches the maximum value and the different dust loads on the ground is not obvious. (3) With the increase of indoor dust loads, the concentration of the human walking-induced indoor PM2.5 resuspension will also increase. When the indoor PM2.5 dust load was 0.30 g/m2, the average concentration of PM2.5 resuspension for breathing plane at 1.1 m sitting position and 1.5 m standing position was 3.03 and 2.68 μg/m3, respectively, which was about 2-3 times of the average concentration of PM2.5 resuspension for PM2.5 dust loads of 0.18 and 0.11 g/m2. (4) The quantitative analysis of PM2.5 resuspension by using particle transport model shows that the magnitude of dust loads don't affect the resuspension fraction of PM2.5, and the resuspension fraction of PM2.5 is 2.2×10-8. When the indoor PM2.5 dust loads is 0.11, 0.18, 0.30 g/m2, the diffusion rate of the human walking-induced indoor PM2.5 resuspension is 7.62×10-11, 1.25×10-10 and 2.08×10-10 kg/s, respectively. The dust load on the ground will affect the diffusion rate of particulate matter and indoor PM2.5 concentration. 
Keywords:indoor air quality  human walking  PM2  5  resuspension fraction  diffustion rate
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号