首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Integrating agricultural and forestry GHG mitigation response into general economy frameworks: Developing a family of response functions
Authors:Dhazn Gillig  Bruce A McCarl  Ronald D Sands
Institution:(1) Department of Agricultural Economics, College Station, TX;(2) Joint Global Change Research Institute, University of Maryland, 8400 Baltimore Avenue, Suite 201, College Park, MD, 20740-2496
Abstract:An econometrically estimated family ofresponse functions is developed forcharacterizing potential responses togreenhouse gas mitigation policies by theagriculture and forestry sectors in theU.S. The response functions are estimatedbased on results of anagricultural/forestry sector model. Theyprovide estimates of sequestration andemission reductions in forestry andagriculture along with levels of sectoralproduction, prices, welfare, andenvironmental attributes given a carbonprice, levels of demand for agriculturalgoods, and the energy price. Sixalternative mitigation policiesrepresenting types of greenhouse gasoffsets allowed are considered. Resultsindicate that the largest quantity ofgreenhouse gas offset consistently appearswith the mitigation policy that pays forall opportunities. Restricting carbonpayments (emission tax or sequestrationsubsidy) only to aff/deforestation or onlyto agricultural sequestration substantiallyreduces potential mitigation. Highercarbon prices lead to more sequestration,less emissions, reduced consumer and totalwelfare, improved environmental indicatorsand increased producer welfare.
Keywords:Agricultural and forest sector  greenhouse gas  mitigation strategies  sequestration and emissions reductions
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号