首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Evaluation of Generic Types of Drilling Fluid Using a Risk-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">Rehan?SadiqEmail author  Tahir?Husain  Brian?Veitch  Neil?Bose
Institution:(1) Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council (NRC), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada;(2) Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johnrsquos, Newfoundland, Canada
Abstract:The composition of drilling muds is based on a mixture of clays and additives in a base fluid. There are three generic categories of base fluid - water, oil, and synthetic. Water-based fluids (WBFs) are relatively environmentally benign, but drilling performance is better with oil-based fluids (OBFs). The oil and gas industry developed synthetic-based fluids (SBFs), such as vegetable esters, olefins, ethers, and others, which provide drilling performance comparable to OBFs, but with lower environmental and occupational health effects. The primary objective of this paper is to present a methodology to guide decision-making in the selection and evaluation of three generic types of drilling fluids using a risk-based analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In this paper a comparison of drilling fluids is made considering various activities involved in the life cycle of drilling fluids.This paper evaluates OBFs, WBFs, and SBFs based on four major impacts—operations, resources, economics, and liabilities. Four major activities—drilling, discharging offshore, loading and transporting, and disposing onshore—cause the operational impacts. Each activity involves risks related to occupational injuries (safety), general public health, environmental impact, and energy use. A multicriteria analysis strategy was used for the selection and evaluation of drilling fluids using a risk-based AHP. A four-level hierarchical structure is developed to determine the final relative scores, and the SBFs are found to be the best option.
Keywords:Drilling fluid  analytic hierarchy process  Weighting scheme  Decision-making
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号