| Affiliation: | (1) Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin, 680 North Park Street, Madison, Wisconsin, USA;(2) Department of Rural Sociology, University of Wisconsin, 430 Agricultural Hall, Madison, Wisconsin, USA;(3) Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin, 312 Taylor Hall, Madison, Wisconsin, USA;(4) USDA Forest Service, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests, Cle Elum Ranger District, 803 W. 2nd Street, Cle Elum, Washington, USA |
| Abstract: | Removing small artificial barriers that hinder upstream migrations of fish is a major problem in riparian habitat restoration. Because of budgetary limitations, it is necessary to prioritize barrier removal and repair decisions. These have usually been based on scoring and ranking procedures, which, although simple to use, can be very inefficient in terms of increasing the amount of accessible instream habitat. We develop a novel decision-making approach, based on integer programming techniques, which optimizes repair and removal decisions. Results show based on real datasets of barrier culverts located in Washington State that scoring and ranking is over 25% below the optimum on average and a full 100% below in the worst case, producing no net habitat gain whatsoever. This is compared to a dynamic programming method that was able to find optimal solutions in less than a second, even for problems with up to several hundred variables, and a heuristic method, which found solutions with less than a 1% average optimality gap in even less time. |
