首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

苏州市集中式饮用水源地健康风险评价
引用本文:刘松华,周静,金文龙,唐明,武瑾.苏州市集中式饮用水源地健康风险评价[J].环境工程,2021,39(5):217-224.
作者姓名:刘松华  周静  金文龙  唐明  武瑾
作者单位:苏州市环境科学研究所,江苏苏州215000;苏州市苏城环境科技有限责任公司,江苏苏州215000
基金项目:水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07205)。
摘    要:通过收集2015-2019年苏州市集中式饮用水源地水质的例行监测数据,采用USEPA(美国环保署)推荐的健康风险评价模型,对12个在用水源地水质进行了较为全面的健康风险评价,并利用GIS软件对评价结果进行了空间可视化展示。结果表明:2015-2019年苏州市集中式饮用水源地致癌风险均值为4.07×10-5/a,非致癌风险均值为3.61×10-9/a,总风险均值为4.07×10-5/a。健康总风险按水源地排序为长江新海坝水源地(5.33×10-5)>长江常熟水源地(4.68×10-5)>阳澄湖水源地(4.49×10-5)>太湖镇湖水源地(4.30×10-5)>太湖贡湖金墅湾水源地(4.14×10-5)>长江浏河口水源地(3.96×10-5)>太湖寺前水源地(3.95×10-5)>傀儡湖水源地(3.79×10-5)>尚湖水源地(3.77×10-5)>太湖渔洋山水源地(3.69×10-5)>太湖庙港水源地(3.46×10-5)>太湖北亭子港水源地(3.39×10-5);按地区排序则为张家港市>工业园区>常熟市>相城区>高新区>太仓市>吴中区>姑苏区>昆山市>吴江区;致癌风险高于非致癌风险,且致癌风险需重点关注Cr(Ⅵ)和As,非致癌风险主要关注氟化物;总体上看,苏州市水源地的健康总风险处于USEPA推荐的最大可接受风险之内,属于比较安全的水源。

关 键 词:水源地  健康  风险评价  时空分布
收稿时间:2020-07-02

HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF CENTRALIZED DRINKING WATER SOURCES IN SUZHOU
Institution:1. Suzhou Research Institute of Environmental Science, Suzhou 215000, China;2. Suzhou Sucheng Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Suzhou 215000, China
Abstract:By collecting the routine monitoring data of the centralized drinking water sources in Suzhou from 2015 to 2019 and adopting the health risk assessment model recommended by the US EPA, a comprehensive health risk assessment was carried out on 12 water sources in use. The results showed that the average risk of carcinogens, non-carcinogens were 4.07×10-5/a, 3.61×10-9/a and 4.07×10-5/a for total health risk respectively. The rank of total health risk by water sources was Changjiang Xinhaiba water source (5.33×10-5)>Changshu Changjiang Rive water source (4.68×10-5)>Yangcheng Lake water source (4.49×10-5)>Zhenhu Tai Lake water source (4.30×10-5)>Gonghu jinshuwan Tai Lake water source (4.14×10-5)>Liuhekou Changjiang Rive water source (3.96×10-5)>Siqian Tai Lake water source (3.95×10-5)>Puppet Lake water source (3.79×10-5)>ShangLake water source (3.77×10-5)>Yuyangshan Taihu Lake water source (3.69×10-5)>Miaogang Taihu Lake water source (3.46×10-5)>North tingzi Taihu Lake water source (3.39×10-5); by region, they were in the sequence of Zhangjiagang City>Industrial Park>Changshu City>Xiangcheng District>High tech Zone>Taicang City>Wuzhong District>Gusu District>Kunshan City>Wujiang District; the carcinogenic risk was higher than that of non-carcinogenic. More attention should be paid to Cr(Ⅵ) and Cd for carcinogens and fluoride for non-carcinogens. In general, water sources in Suzhou were relatively safe and their risk rank were within the maximum acceptable risk threshold recommended by USEPA.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号