| M-AHP-熵权组合赋权法在垃圾渗滤液处理技术评价中的应用 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龙腾锐,赵欣,林于廉,易洁.M-AHP-熵权组合赋权法在垃圾渗滤液处理技术评价中的应用[J].环境工程学报,2010,4(11):2455-2460. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龙腾锐 赵欣 林于廉 易洁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆大学城市建设与环境工程学院，重庆 400045,重庆大学城市建设与环境工程学院，重庆 400045,重庆大学城市建设与环境工程学院，重庆 400045,重庆大学城市建设与环境工程学院，重庆 400045 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中荷国际合作项目（MOC-NGGP-2003-03） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过分析目前综合评价赋权方法存在的弊端,提出了主客观相结合对指标进行赋权的方法,即采用基于MATLAB优化工具箱的层次分析法(M-AHP)建立主观权重,采用熵权法建立客观权重,将主客观权重加以综合来确定评价指标的权重。最后将该方法应用于重庆市卫生填埋场的处理技术的评价指标,然后按照模糊积分评价模型得出综合评价值,从3种备选方案中得出了MBR(膜生物反应器)+NF(纳滤)工艺为最佳方案。
|
| 关 键 词： | M-AHP 熵权法 模糊积分 渗滤液处理技术 |
Application of M-AHP-entropy power combination weighing method in evaluation of landfill leachate treatment technology |
| |
| Long Tengrui,Zhao Xin,Lin Yulian and Yi Jie.Application of M-AHP-entropy power combination weighing method in evaluation of landfill leachate treatment technology[J].Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control,2010,4(11):2455-2460. |
| |
| Authors: | Long Tengrui Zhao Xin Lin Yulian and Yi Jie |
| |
| Institution: | College of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering,Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045,China,College of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering,Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045,China,College of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering,Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045,China and College of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering,Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045,China |
| |
| Abstract: | By analysing the disadvantages of the current comprehensive evaluation methods, the article brings forward a method of empowering the index, which combines the subjective weight with objective weight. The method is to establish subjective weights by M-AHP based on optimization toolbox of MATLAB and establish objective weights by entropy power means, then to determine the weights of evaluation index based on combining the objective with the subjective weights. Finally apply this method to the treatment technology of sanitary landfill in Chongqing, and use the fuzzy integral technique to work out comprehensive assessment value of technical scheme, then draw a conclusion that MBR+NF technology may be the optimal scheme among the three optional schemes. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《环境工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《环境工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
