Rhetoric and Reality of Water Quality Trading and the Potential for Market‐like Reform1 |
| |
Authors: | Leonard Shabman |
| |
Institution: | 1. Respectively, Professor, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061;2. and Resident Scholar, Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street, Washington, D.C. 20036 |
| |
Abstract: | Stephenson, Kurt and Leonard Shabman, 2011. Rhetoric and Reality of Water Quality Trading and the Potential for Market‐Like Reform. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 47(1):15‐28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752‐1688.2010.00492.x Abstract: Many public interest groups, government agencies, and professional economists argue that current approaches to water quality trading are a cost‐effective, politically practical innovation for achieving water quality standards, in part by addressing one of the most difficult water quality improvement challenges – limiting the discharge from nonpoint sources. A critical analysis shows that these claims for current water quality trading programs are often unrealized. This rhetoric, without adherence to principles of market‐like reform, can undermine the support of regulated parties for meaningful water quality policy reform, contribute to missed opportunities to implement cost‐effective programs, and postpone successfully meeting the challenge of limiting nonpoint source discharges. A better understanding and application of market‐like principles can result in an improved design of trading as well as general water quality management programs. |
| |
Keywords: | market‐like water quality economics water policy trading point and nonpoint pollution |
|
|