首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

低成本大气颗粒物传感器的室外环境性能评测研究
引用本文:郭英哲,高健,王文兴,秦孝良,任建宁,倪登峰.低成本大气颗粒物传感器的室外环境性能评测研究[J].中国环境科学,2021,40(12):5133-5141.
作者姓名:郭英哲  高健  王文兴  秦孝良  任建宁  倪登峰
作者单位:1. 山东大学环境研究院, 山东 青岛 266237;2. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京 朝阳 100012;3. 山西大学环境与资源学院, 山西 太原 030006
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(42075182)
摘    要:对目前大气环境颗粒物监测中采用的基于光散射法的3种型号传感器进行了评测研究,其中A和B是用于室内环境监测,C用于室外环境监测.对3种型号颗粒物传感器与基于β射线方法的标准仪器MATONE BAM-1020对比,对传感器的变异性、时间序列、传感器与标准仪器的线性相关性、其他因素影响、数据质量五个方面开展了分析.结果表明:各型号颗粒物传感器之间有较强相关性(R2达到了0.95以上);3种颗粒物传感器与标准仪器测量结果吻合度较高,R2分别为0.58,0.80,0.61,且在整个测试时间段内,传感器相对于标准仪器来说高估了PM2.5;高的相对湿度(RH>50%)和PM2.5/PM10(ratio)会对传感器产生影响.A、B、C三种型号传感器PM2.5数据平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为23.31,10.14,28.17μg/m3;归一化均方根误差(RMSE)分别为25.80,14.01,32.98μg/m3,准确性(A%)分别为51.39%,72.97%,46.51%.

关 键 词:空气污染  环境监测  颗粒物  传感器  PM2.5  

Research on outdoor environmental performance evaluation of low-cost atmospheric particulate sensors
GUO Ying-zhe,GAO Jian,WANG Wen-xing,QIN Xiao-liang,REN Jian-ning,NI Deng-feng.Research on outdoor environmental performance evaluation of low-cost atmospheric particulate sensors[J].China Environmental Science,2021,40(12):5133-5141.
Authors:GUO Ying-zhe  GAO Jian  WANG Wen-xing  QIN Xiao-liang  REN Jian-ning  NI Deng-feng
Institution:1. Environmental Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China;2. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;3. College of Environment and Resources, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
Abstract:In this paper, three types of sensors based on the light scattering method used in atmospheric environmental particulate matter monitoring are evaluated and researched, of which A and B are used for indoor environmental monitoring, and C is used for outdoor environmental monitoring. The three types of particulate matter sensors are compared with the standard instrument MATONE BAM-1020based on the β-ray method, and the variability of the sensor, the time series, the linear correlation between the sensor and the standard instrument, the influence of other factors, and the data quality are analyzed. The results show that there is a strong correlation between the various types of particulate matter sensors (R2 has reached 0.95 or more); the measurement results of the three particulate matter sensors and the standard instrument have a high degree of agreement, and R2 is 0.58, 0.80, 0.61, respectively, and during the entire test period, the sensor overestimated PM2.5 relative to the standard instrument; high relative humidity (RH>50%) and PM2.5/PM10 (ratio) will affect the sensor. The average absolute error (MAE) of the PM2.5 data of the three types of sensors of A, B, and C are 23.31, 10.14, 28.17μg/m3 respectively; the normalized root mean square error (RMSE) is 25.80, 14.01, 32.98μg/m3; the accuracy (A%) is 51.39%, 72.97%, 46.51%, respectively.
Keywords:air pollution  environmental monitoring  particulate matte  low cost sensors  PM2  5  
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号