首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Evolving paradigms for landscape-scale renewable resource management in the United States
Institution:1. Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3166, USA;2. Department of Rangeland Ecology and Watershed Management, Wyoming Water Resources Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-3067, USA;1. Computer Department, Jing-De-Zhen Ceramic Institute, Jing-De-Zhen 333403, China;2. School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT, UK;3. Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia;4. Gordon Life Science Institute, Boston, MA 02478, USA;1. Department of African Studies and Anthropology, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom;2. Institute of Forest Botany and Forest Zoology, Technische Universität Dresden, Pienner Str. 7, 01737 Tharandt, Germany;1. Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia;2. Tartu College of Tallinn University of Technology, Tartu, Estonia
Abstract:Patterns of selection and evolution of renewable resource management paradigms appear when strategies are considered across a temporal scale. The roles of renewable resource managers were established during the early twentieth century and have since evolved. Autocratic natural-science-based management (ANM) of renewable resources was institutionalized in the early twentieth century following the principle of management based on science with administrative decisions by professional agency employees. A more recent form of management paradigm is interactive natural-science-based management (INM) which provides for limited stakeholder involvement in the decision-making process. These historic paradigms often inadequately addressed social and political aspects of renewable resource management leading managers to adopt new management paradigms involving communications and negotiations among stakeholders, not just science and administrative decisions. The inability of either ANM or INM paradigms to win uncontested agency and public acceptance, coupled with demands to increase spatial scales of management and public (stakeholder) involvement, is providing impetus for emergence of a new paradigm. The evolving paradigm can be defined as collaborative natural- and social-science-based management (CNSM) and provides a framework for approaching and finding solutions to landscape-scale problems. Successful evolution of this paradigm will require removing barriers to societal involvement in management decision-making institutionalized over the past century.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号