Epidemiologic Analysis of Factors Associated with Local Disappearances of Native Ranid Frogs in Arizona |
| |
Authors: | CARMEL L. WITTE§ ,MICHAEL J. SREDL&dagger ,REW S. KANE§ &Dagger , LAURA L. HUNGERFORD&dagger &dagger |
| |
Affiliation: | Virginia–Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742-4004, U.S.A.;Zoological Society of San Diego, Wildlife Disease Laboratories, P.O. Box 120551, San Diego, CA 92112-0551, U.S.A., email;Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, AZ 85023-4399, U.S.A.;Environmental Health Program, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A.;Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201-1509, U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract: We examined factors that may independently or synergistically contribute to amphibian population declines. We used epidemiologic case–control methodology to sample and analyze a large database developed and maintained by the Arizona Game and Fish Department that describes historical and currently known ranid frog localities in Arizona, U.S.A. Sites with historical documentation of target ranid species ( n = 324) were evaluated to identify locations where frogs had disappeared during the study period (case sites) and locations where frog populations persisted (control sites). Between 1986 and 2003, 117 (36%) of the 324 sites became case sites, of which 105 were used in the analyses. An equal number of control sites were sampled to control for the effects of time. Risk factors, or predictor variables, were defined from environmental data summarized during site surveys and geographic information system data layers. We evaluated risk factors with univariate and multifactorial logistic-regression analyses to derive odds ratios (OR). Odds for local population disappearance were significantly related to 4 factors in the multifactorial model. Disappearance of frog populations increased with increasing elevation (OR = 2.7 for every 500 m, p < 0.01). Sites where disappearances occurred were 4.3 times more likely to have other nearby sites that also experienced disappearances (OR = 4.3, p < 0.01), whereas the odds of disappearance were 6.7 times less (OR = 0.15, p < 0.01) when there was a source population nearby. Sites with disappearances were 2.6 times more likely to have introduced crayfish than were control sites (OR = 2.6, p = 0.04). The identification of factors associated with frog disappearances increases understanding of declines occurring in natural populations and aids in conservation efforts to reestablish and protect native ranids by identifying and prioritizing implicated threats. |
| |
Keywords: | amphibian decline case–control methods frog decline risk factor analysis wildlife epidemiology |
|
|