首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Meta‐Analysis of Attitudes toward Damage‐Causing Mammalian Wildlife
Authors:RUTH KANSKY  MARTIN KIDD  ANDREW T KNIGHT
Institution:1. Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, , Matieland 7602, South Africa;2. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Centre for Statistical Consultation, Stellenbosch University, , Matieland 7602, South Africa;3. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, , Berkshire, SL5 7PY United Kingdom;4. Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, , Port Elizabeth, 6031 Eastern Cape, South Africa
Abstract:Many populations of threatened mammals persist outside formally protected areas, and their survival depends on the willingness of communities to coexist with them. An understanding of the attitudes, and specifically the tolerance, of individuals and communities and the factors that determine these is therefore fundamental to designing strategies to alleviate human‐wildlife conflict. We conducted a meta‐analysis to identify factors that affected attitudes toward 4 groups of terrestrial mammals. Elephants (65%) elicited the most positive attitudes, followed by primates (55%), ungulates (53%), and carnivores (44%). Urban residents presented the most positive attitudes (80%), followed by commercial farmers (51%) and communal farmers (26%). A tolerance to damage index showed that human tolerance of ungulates and primates was proportional to the probability of experiencing damage while elephants elicited tolerance levels higher than anticipated and carnivores elicited tolerance levels lower than anticipated. Contrary to conventional wisdom, experiencing damage was not always the dominant factor determining attitudes. Communal farmers had a lower probability of being positive toward carnivores irrespective of probability of experiencing damage, while commercial farmers and urban residents were more likely to be positive toward carnivores irrespective of damage. Urban residents were more likely to be positive toward ungulates, elephants, and primates when probability of damage was low, but not when it was high. Commercial and communal farmers had a higher probability of being positive toward ungulates, primates, and elephants irrespective of probability of experiencing damage. Taxonomic bias may therefore be important. Identifying the distinct factors explaining these attitudes and the specific contexts in which they operate, inclusive of the species causing damage, will be essential for prioritizing conservation investments. Meta‐Análisis de las Posturas hacia la Mamíferos Silvestres Causantes de Daños
Keywords:carnivores  conservation psychology  elephant  human‐wildlife conflict  primates  tolerance  ungulates  Carní  voros  conflicto humano–  vida silvestre  elefante  primates  psicologí  a de la conservació  n  tolerancia  ungulado
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号