| 4种重要因素对柴油机颗粒物排放因子的量化影响研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 金陶胜,胡杰,李振国,陆凯波,赵帅,刘双喜,刘卫林.4种重要因素对柴油机颗粒物排放因子的量化影响研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(12):4630-4635. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 金陶胜 胡杰 李振国 陆凯波 赵帅 刘双喜 刘卫林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 国家环境保护城市空气颗粒物污染防治重点实验室, 天津 300350;2. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 城市交通污染防治研究中心, 天津 300071,1. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 国家环境保护城市空气颗粒物污染防治重点实验室, 天津 300350;2. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 城市交通污染防治研究中心, 天津 300071,中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司, 天津 300300,1. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 国家环境保护城市空气颗粒物污染防治重点实验室, 天津 300350;2. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 城市交通污染防治研究中心, 天津 300071,1. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 国家环境保护城市空气颗粒物污染防治重点实验室, 天津 300350;2. 南开大学环境科学与工程学院, 城市交通污染防治研究中心, 天津 300071,中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司, 天津 300300,中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司, 天津 300300 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金面上项目（No.21477057） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在发动机台架测试基础上,按照发动机排放阶段、油品种类、后处理装置和运行工况4种因素的不同,进行了24组测试,研究了颗粒物排放因子.同时,应用单因素敏感性分析,探究了发动机排放阶段和油品种类对颗粒物排放因子的影响;并运用多元线性回归分析,探讨了4种因素对颗粒物排放因子的影响力大小排序.结果显示:24组柴油机测试的颗粒物排放因子均值为(21.9±24.5) mg·kWh~(-1);使用国Ⅴ排放标准柴油机的颗粒物排放因子((14.7±5.6) mg·kWh~(-1))比国Ⅳ排放标准柴油机((19.4±16.4) mg·kWh~(-1))有所下降;国Ⅳ柴油、国Ⅴ柴油和混合柴油的颗粒物排放因子平均值分别为120.0、(11.8±1.0)和(11.5±1.3) mg·kWh~(-1),混合柴油颗粒物排放因子与国Ⅴ柴油相近,两者相比国Ⅳ柴油有明显下降;油品种类是影响颗粒物排放因子的第一大因素,后处理是影响颗粒物排放因子的第二大因素.
|
| 关 键 词： | 柴油机 颗粒物排放 油品 后处理 多元线性回归 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018/6/5 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018/8/14 0:00:00 |
Study on quantitative effects of four important factors on diesel engine particulate emission factors |
| |
| JIN Taosheng,HU Jie,LI Zhenguo,LU Kaibo,ZHAO Shuai,LIU Shuangxi and LIU Weilin.Study on quantitative effects of four important factors on diesel engine particulate emission factors[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2018,38(12):4630-4635. |
| |
| Authors: | JIN Taosheng HU Jie LI Zhenguo LU Kaibo ZHAO Shuai LIU Shuangxi and LIU Weilin |
| |
| Institution: | 1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350;2. Center for Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071,1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350;2. Center for Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071,China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300300,1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350;2. Center for Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071,1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350;2. Center for Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071,China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300300 and China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300300 |
| |
| Abstract: | Diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions were explored by using engine dynamometer and 24 DPM emission factors were estimated. The effects of emission standard or fuel quality on DPM emission factors were evaluated by using single factor sensitivity analysis, and further, the effects of four important factors (emission standard, fuel quality, emission control device and driving condition) on DPM emission factors were explored by using multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed:1The average DPM emission factor was (21.9±24.5) mg·kWh-1; 2The average PM emission factor of China 5 (emission standard) diesel engines ((14.7±5.6) mg·kWh-1) was less than that of China 4 diesel engines ((19.4±16.4) mg·kWh-1); 3The average DPM emission factors of China 4 (emission standard) diesel, China 5 diesel, and mixed diesel were 120.0, (11.8±1.0) and (11.5±1.3) mg·kWh-1, respectively; 4Fuel quality was the most important factor affecting DPM emission while emission control device was the second. |
| |
| Keywords: | diesel engines DPM emission fuel quality emission control device multiple linear regression |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
