Environmental performance comparison of wet and thermal routes for phosphate fertilizer production using LCA – A Brazilian experience |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA;3. Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA;4. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon;5. OCP Policy Center - OCP Foundation, Ryad Business Center, South 4th Floor, Mahaj Erryad, Rabat, Morocco;6. Department of Rural Systems Engineering, Research Institute for Agriculture & Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;7. Department of Rural and Bio-systems Engineering & Education and BK21 Research Unit for Climate-Smart Reclaimed-Tideland Agriculture, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea;1. School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China;2. Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0B9, Canada;3. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, United States;4. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;5. School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to perform an environmental comparison between the phosphate fertilizers fused magnesium phosphate (FMP) and triple superphosphate (TSP). In order to perform the comparison a functional unit (FU) of 41.66 kg P2O5, which corresponds to 208 kg FMP (20% P2O5) and 93 kg TSP (45% P2O5) was defined. Concerning the product systems a “cradle to gate” approach was used in both cases. In order to perform the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) the impact categories: global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion potential (ODP), human toxicity potential (HTP), fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity potential (FWAETP), acidification potential (AP) and eutrophication potential (EP) were selected. The development of this step was accomplished using CML 2 baseline 2000 method, with the help of the computational tool SimaPro 5, version 5.1.0.21. The study identified that in the case of FMP, the extensive electricity dependence is the main source of potential negative environmental impacts. On the other hand, for the TSP, the great distances between the phosphate rock mines and the main manufacture centers for both H3PO4 and TSP together with the transportation model adopted in this country appear as the main causes of environmental impacts. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
