首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The role of wax and resin in the nestmate recognition system of a stingless bee, Tetragonisca angustula
Authors:Sam M. Jones  Jelle S. van Zweden  Christoph Grüter  Cristiano Menezes  Denise A. Alves  Patrícia Nunes-Silva  Tomer Czaczkes  Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca  Francis L. W. Ratnieks
Affiliation:(1) Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK;(2) Faculdade de Filosofia, Ci?ncias e Letras de Ribeir?o Preto, USP, Avenida Bandeirantes nr, 3900, Monte Alegre, Ribeir?o Preto, SP, Brazil;(3) Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Bioci?ncias, USP, Rua do Mat?o, trav. 14 nr. 321, Cidade Universit?ria, S?o Paulo, Brazil;(4) Present address: Centre for Social Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;(5) Present address: Embrapa Amaz?nia Oriental, Trav. Dr. En?as Pinheiro s/ nr., Bel?m, Para, Brazil;(6) Present address: Universidade Federal Rural do Semi?rido, Mossor?, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Abstract:Recent research has shown that entrance guards of the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula make less errors in distinguishing nestmates from non-nestmates than all other bee species studied to date, but how they achieve this is unknown. We performed four experiments to investigate nestmate recognition by entrance guards in T. angustula. We first investigated the effect of colony odours on acceptance. Nestmates that acquired odour from non-nestmate workers were 63% more likely to be rejected while the acceptance rate of non-nestmates treated with nestmate odour increased by only 7%. We further hypothesised that guards standing on the wax entrance tube might use the tube as an odour referent. However, our findings showed that there was no difference in the acceptance of non-nestmates by guards standing on their own colony’s entrance tube versus the non-nestmate’s entrance tube. Moreover, treatment of bees with nestmate and non-nestmate resin or wax had a negative effect on acceptance rates of up to 65%, regardless of the origin of the wax or resin. The role of resin as a source of recognition cues was further investigated by unidirectionally transferring resin stores between colonies. Acceptance rates of nestmates declined by 37% for hives that donated resin, contrasting with resin donor hives where acceptance of non-nestmates increased by 21%. Overall, our results confirm the accuracy of nestmate recognition in T. angustula and reject the hypothesis that this high level of accuracy is due to the use of the wax entrance tubes as a referent for colony odour. Our findings also suggest that odours directly acquired from resin serve no primary function as nestmate recognition cues. The lack of consistency among colonies plus the complex results of the third and fourth experiments highlight the need for further research on the role of nest materials and cuticular profiles in understanding nestmate recognition in T. angustula.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号