首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

主动参与还是被动选择:农户村域环境治理参与行为及效果差异分析
引用本文:唐林,罗小锋,黄炎忠,余威震,张俊飚. 主动参与还是被动选择:农户村域环境治理参与行为及效果差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(7): 1747-1756. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201907024
作者姓名:唐林  罗小锋  黄炎忠  余威震  张俊飚
作者单位:华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北武汉430070;湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北武汉430070;华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北武汉430070;湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北武汉430070;华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北武汉430070;湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北武汉430070;华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北武汉430070;湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北武汉430070;华中农业大学经济管理学院,湖北武汉430070;湖北农村发展研究中心,湖北武汉430070
基金项目:国家社会科学基金;软科学研究计划;中央高校基本科研业务费专项
摘    要:基于湖北省的调研数据,分析农户参与村域环境治理的行为及行为效果,并运用Heckman两阶段模型加以实证检验。结果发现:是否为村干部、家庭总人口、家庭年收入、家庭耕地面积、行为认知、环境状况评价、气候变化感知以及政府激励是农户参与村域环境治理的关键因素。受教育年限、环境容忍度、行为认知、环境状况评价以及气候变化感知则对农户环境治理参与行为效果有显著影响。在此基础上,从农户参与环境治理的行为动机出发,并借助Oaxaca-Blinder反事实分解方法,探讨主动参与和被动参与两种行为的效果差异及产生差异的原因。结果显示,禀赋差异和禀赋回报率差异均致使主动参与者的行为效果均值(3.729)显著高于被动参与者的行为效果均值(3.027)。其中,受教育年限、行为认知和气候变化感知的差异是主动参与者和被动参与者行为效果存在差异的主要因素。

关 键 词:主动参与  被动选择  村域环境治理  Heckman模型  Oaxaca-Blinder反事实分解

Active Participation or Passive Choice: Analysis of the Participation Behaviors and Effects of Villege Domain Environmental Governance
TANG Lin,LUO Xiao-feng,HUANG Yan-zhong,YU Wei-zhen,ZHANG Jun-biao. Active Participation or Passive Choice: Analysis of the Participation Behaviors and Effects of Villege Domain Environmental Governance[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtza Basin, 2019, 28(7): 1747-1756. DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201907024
Authors:TANG Lin  LUO Xiao-feng  HUANG Yan-zhong  YU Wei-zhen  ZHANG Jun-biao
Affiliation:(1.College of Economics & Management,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070, China;2.Hubei Rural Development Research Center,Wuhan 430073,China);
Abstract:Based on survey data from Hubei Province, this paper focused on the behavior and behavioral effects of farmers participating in village domain environmental governance, and the Heckman two-stage model was used for empirical test. The results show that whether it is the village cadres, the total family population, family annual income, family arable land area, behavioral cognition, environmental status assessment, climate change perception and government incentives are the key factors for farmers to participate in village domain environmental governance.Besides, the years of education, environmental tolerance, behavioral cognition, environmental status assessment and climate change perception have a significant impact on the effects of farmers’ environmental governance participation behavior. On these basis, so having considered about the behavioral motives of farmers who participate in environmental governance, this paper discusses the differences between the effects of active participation and passive participation with the help of Oaxaca-Blinder counterfactual decomposition method. And then trying to find the cause of the differences. Finally, the findings reveal that both the difference in endowment and the rate of return on endowment resulted in the mean behavioral effect of active participants (3.729) being significantly higher than the mean of behavioral effects of passive participants (3.027). Among them, the differences in years of education, behavioral cognition and climate change perception are the main factors that influence the behavioral effects of active participants and passive participants.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号