首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Socioecological correlates of inter-individual variation in orangutan diets at Ketambe, Sumatra
Authors:Madeleine E Hardus  Han de Vries  David F Dellatore  Adriano R Lameira  Steph B J Menken  Serge A Wich
Institution:1. Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Sciencepark 904, 1098, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2. Behavioral Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584, Utrecht, the Netherlands
3. Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland
4. Sumatran Orangutan Society (SOS), The Old Music Hall, 106-108 Cowley Rd, Oxford, OX4 1JE, UK
5. Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Egerton Court, 2 Rodney Street, Liverpool, L3 5UX, UK
Abstract:The diet of great apes consists of several hundred plant species. The factors determining diet differences have been examined between populations but not within a population, probably due to the confounding effect of seasonal fluctuations on fruit availability. In Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii), fruit availability appears to be sufficiently high year round to have little influence on diet composition, which in turn allows for addressing this question. We examined the diet of eight adult female orangutans at Ketambe, Sumatra, and investigated whether fig and non-fig fruit availability, association time, and/or home range measures influenced dietary overlap between female dyads. Between most pairs, females’ diets were different: 16 out of 23 pairs had a significantly low diet species overlap. Only fig diet overlap was influenced (negatively) by the availability of non-fig fruit. Association time only influenced (positively) fig diet overlap. Hence, orangutans gathered in fig trees when non-fig fruit availability was low. Home range measures did not influence overall diet overlap. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that, while controlling for confounding factors, individuals with similar energetic requirements, from the same population and sharing the same area, make different dietary choices relatively to their preferred (non-fig) fruit constituting the majority of their diet. Social transmission, with putative matrilineal diet traditions, suitably explains these results. We discuss the implications of the findings for orangutan conservation, namely on reintroduction and the felling of fig trees.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号