首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools
Institution:1. Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies (IES), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;2. Sustainability Assessment Program (SAP), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;3. ISA, School of Physics A28, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;1. General Management and Economics, Goa Institute of Management, India;2. Department of Operations Management & Quantitative Techniques, Indian Institute of Management Indore, India;3. Carrera de Economía, Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador;1. Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, United States;2. Frederick S. Pardee Center for International Futures, United States
Abstract:The recently-adopted global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will have significant implications for national development planning in both developed and developing countries in the post-2015 period to 2030. Integrated, nationally-owned SDG strategies will be at the centre of national efforts to implement the new sustainable development agenda. The long-run processes and systems perspective that are inherent in the SDGs present complex analytical problems for policymakers and analysts. Scenario analysis and quantitative modelling will be important analytical tools to support national sustainable development planning, and there is an increasingly sophisticated suite of models available to decision makers. This paper reviews and assesses a broad range of different quantitative models that have the potential to support national development planning for the SDGs. The study develops a typology and inventory of 80 different models, and then reviews the comparative strengths, weaknesses and general utility of different models through an initial screening and subsequent multi-criteria analysis of short-listed models. Current gaps in model capabilities are highlighted in the context of providing analytical support for national development planning for the SDGs. While some existing models are particularly relevant, it is unlikely that an ideal model can analyse all SDG targets and variables of interest within a single modelling framework. Top-down ‘macro framework’ models are likely to be more useful for undertaking system-level or economy-wide scenario analysis driven by the national long-term goals and targets, and for exploring trade-offs and synergies among sectors. Bottom-up sectoral models will be able to support far more detailed option-level impact analysis of concrete interventions, technologies and investments. Combining both approaches within an analytical framework will provide a robust approach for analysis and decision-making. The results highlight a range of potential gaps in current modelling capabilities, and provide some new tools to assist with model selection.
Keywords:Scenario modelling  Sustainable Development Goals  Sustainability science  Ecological economics  Multi-criteria analysis  Analytical hierarchy process
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号