首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Constructing collaborative communities of researchers in the environmental domain. A case study of interdisciplinary research between legal scholars and policy analysts
Institution:1. Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées (ENPC), France;2. Ecole d’Urbanisme de Paris, Université Paris Est Créteil, France;3. Utrecht University, The Netherlands;4. Radboud University, The Netherlands;5. University of Antwerp, Belgium;1. University of Brescia, Italy;2. Aristotle University Thessaloniki, Greece;3. Umweltbundesamt, Germany;4. Politecnico di Milano, Italy;5. Instytut Badań Systemowych PAN, Poland;6. European Commission, JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Air and Climate Unit, Italy;7. University of Strasburg, France;8. Institut National de l’EnviRonnement Industriel et des RisqueS, INERIS, France;1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Vileikos st. 8, 44404 Kaunas, Lithuania;2. Departament of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 4, 50009 Kaunas, Lithuania;3. Baltic Institute of Advanced Technology, Sauletekio av. 15, 10224 Vilnius, Lithuania;1. Department of Economic and Legal Studies – University of Naples “Parthenope”, Via Ammiraglio Ferdinando Acton, 38, 80133 Naples, Italy;2. Department of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative Sciences. University “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara. Viale Pindaro, 42, 65127 Pescara, Italy;3. Department of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative Sciences. University “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Pindaro, 42, 65127 Pescara, Italy;1. CESAM, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal;2. VITO, Flemish Institute for Technological Research, B-2400, Mol, Belgium;3. Brussels Environment, B-3000, Brussels, Belgium;4. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;5. TerrAria s.r.l., Milan, Italy
Abstract:The article offers an analysis of the interactions between legal and policy science researchers within a European project on flood risk management using a “Policy Arrangement Approach” (PAA). While interdisciplinary research is increasingly becoming a ‘must’ in environmental governance, under what conditions is cooperation possible and desirable? Our analysis shows that the PAA is not mobilized as an interdisciplinary method, but offers a framework for researchers from different disciplines to learn to work together on a subject such as flooding, requiring interdisciplinary insights. The paper shows the steps that are progressively put in place to reach a common language and reformulate issues by benefitting from each other’s view and approaches. The article concludes by drawing attention to new means of knowledge production relating to so-called “messy” or “wicked” problems, such as environmental issues. Within this framework, interdisciplinary work is not considered to be a pre-condition for the study, but rather the result of the research process itself. The analysis draws attention to the actual (working) conditions established to create an interdisciplinary community of flooding practices by challenging disciplinary borders.
Keywords:Legal-policy research  Flooding  Knowledge  Community of practice
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号