Persuasiveness,importance and novelty of arguments about Carbon Capture and Storage |
| |
Institution: | 1. Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands;2. Utrecht Sustainability Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a promising technology for reducing carbon emissions, but the public is often reluctant to support it. To understand why public support is lacking, it is crucial to establish what citizens think about the arguments that are used by proponents and opponents of CCS. We determined the persuasiveness, importance and novelty of 32 arguments for and against CCS using a discrete choice experiment in which respondents made consecutive choices between pairs of pro or con arguments. We used latent class models to identify population segments with different preferences. The results show that citizens find arguments about climate protection, which is the primary goal of CCS, less persuasive than other arguments, such as normative arguments (for example ‘a waste product such as CO2 should be disposed of properly’) or arguments about benefits of CCS for energy production and economic growth. This discrepancy complicates communication that aims to convince citizens of the benefits of CCS for climate protection. |
| |
Keywords: | Carbon Capture and Storage Communication Argument Choice experiment Climate change Public perception |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|