首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


How are coastal households responding to climate change?
Institution:1. Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4556, Australia;2. Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States;3. Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, 170 Kessels Road QLD 4111, Australia;1. Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia;2. School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia;3. Centre for Infrastructure Engineering & Management, Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia;1. TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands;2. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands;3. Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia;1. Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Avenue, MC5501, New York, 10027 NY, United States;2. Princeton University, Center for Policy Research in Energy and the Environment, Robertson Hall, Princeton, 08540 NJ, United States
Abstract:In Australia, shared responsibility is a concept advocated to promote collective climate change adaptation by multiple actors and institutions. However, a shared response is often promoted in the absence of information regarding actions currently taken; in particular, there is limited knowledge regarding action occurring at the household scale. To address this gap, we examine household actions taken to address climate change and associated hazards in two Australian coastal communities. Mixed methods research is conducted to answer three questions: (1) what actions are currently taken (mitigation, actions to lobby for change or adaptation to climate impacts)? (2) why are these actions taken (e.g. are they consistent with capacity, experience, perceptions of risk); and (3) what are the implications for adaptation? We find that households are predominantly mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and that impact orientated adaptive actions are limited. Coping strategies are considered sufficient to mange climate risks, proving a disincentive for additional adaptive action. Influencing factors differ, but generally, risk perception and climate change belief are associated with action. However, the likelihood of more action is a function of homeownership and a tendency to plan ahead. Addressing factors that support or constrain household adaptive decision-making and action, from the physical (e.g. homeownership) to the social (e.g. skills in planning and a culture of adapting to change) will be critical in increasing household participation in adaptation.
Keywords:Vulnerability  Resilience  Risk  Decision-making  Environmental hazards
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号