首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

广西典型碳酸盐岩区农田土壤-作物系统重金属生物有效性及迁移富集特征
引用本文:马宏宏,彭敏,刘飞,郭飞,唐世琪,刘秀金,周亚龙,杨柯,李括,杨峥,成杭新.广西典型碳酸盐岩区农田土壤-作物系统重金属生物有效性及迁移富集特征[J].环境科学,2020,41(1):449-459.
作者姓名:马宏宏  彭敏  刘飞  郭飞  唐世琪  刘秀金  周亚龙  杨柯  李括  杨峥  成杭新
作者单位:中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000,中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所,廊坊 065000;中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学调查评价研究中心,廊坊 065000;中国地质科学院地球表层碳-汞地球化学循环重点实验室,廊坊 065000
基金项目:地质矿产资源及环境调查专项(DD20160313,DD20190522);全国土壤污染状况详查示范项目(121201108000168530)
摘    要:为揭示碳酸盐岩地质高背景区土壤重金属生态风险,选择广西典型的成土母岩为碳酸盐岩的土壤重金属高背景区,采集水稻籽实及对应根系土样品68套,在分析测试土壤、农作物籽实样品中砷(As)、镉(Cd)、铬(Cr)、铜(Cu)、汞(Hg)、镍(Ni)、铅(Pb)和锌(Zn)这8种重金属含量及土壤中重金属赋存形态的基础上,采用统计学、地累积指数、生物富集系数及相关性分析等方法开展土壤重金属生态风险研究.结果表明,研究区土壤中8种重金属平均含量明显高于全国和广西表层土壤的平均水平,其中Cd、As和Cr超过农用地土壤污染筛选值的比例分别达95. 6%、86. 8%和69. 1%,超过土壤污染管控值的比例分别为27. 9%、17. 6%和5. 9%.区内土壤中As、Cr、Cu、Ni、Pb和Zn主要以残渣态为主(残渣态占比 80%),显示出较低的生物活性; Cd的生物活性相对较高,生物有效态组分占20. 99%,但仍明显低于全国其它非碳酸盐岩地区的土壤; Hg的潜在生物有效态组分占44. 04%,然而土壤中Hg全量较低,因此其潜在生物有效态的绝对含量较低.与土壤相比,研究区水稻籽实中重金属超标率明显较低,仅部分样品中Cd、Cr、Pb超过国家食品限量标准,超标率分别为8. 8%、2. 9%和23. 5%.相关性分析显示,研究区土壤重金属全量与对应的水稻籽实中重金属含量不存在显著正相关关系.水稻籽实重金属生物富集能力普遍较低,8种重金属生物富集系数(BCF)的均值均小于0. 1,其中As、Cr、Hg、Ni和Pb的BCF均值小于0. 05.上述结果表明,对于碳酸盐岩等地质高背景区,相关部门在制定污染土壤管控政策时不能仅以土壤重金属全量作为衡量标准,应综合考虑金属赋存形态、生物活性及农作物超标率等因素.

关 键 词:碳酸盐岩  土壤-作物系统  重金属形态  生物有效性  生物富集系数
收稿时间:2019/5/7 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/8/12 0:00:00

Bioavailability, Translocation, and Accumulation Characteristic of Heavy Metals in a Soil-Crop System from a Typical Carbonate Rock Area in Guangxi, China
MA Hong-hong,PENG Min,LIU Fei,GUO Fei,TANG Shi-qi,LIU Xiu-jin,ZHOU Ya-long,YANG Ke,LI Kuo,YANG Zheng and CHENG Hang-xin.Bioavailability, Translocation, and Accumulation Characteristic of Heavy Metals in a Soil-Crop System from a Typical Carbonate Rock Area in Guangxi, China[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2020,41(1):449-459.
Authors:MA Hong-hong  PENG Min  LIU Fei  GUO Fei  TANG Shi-qi  LIU Xiu-jin  ZHOU Ya-long  YANG Ke  LI Kuo  YANG Zheng and CHENG Hang-xin
Institution:Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China,Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China and Institute of Geophysical&Geochemical Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China;Research Center of Geochemical Survey and Assessment on Land Quality, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China;Key Laboratory of Geochemical Cycling of Carbon and Mercury in the Earth''s Critical Zone, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Langfang 065000, China
Abstract:This study uses 68 sets of paddy soil and rice grain samples collected from an area of carbonate rocks in Guangxi Province, China, to explore the ecological risks of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, Ni, and Zn) in soils from a high background area. We analyzed the concentrations of these heavy metals in soil and grain samples, and their chemical speciation in soil, and use these data to assess the associated ecological risks by means of statistics, a geo-accumulation index, bioconcentration factors (BCF), and correlation analysis. The arithmetic mean values of heavy metals concentrations in soil samples from the study area were (75.8±50.1), (1.91±1.02), (467.0±253.1), (48.5±9.8), (0.21±0.08), (76.2±28.1), (84.2±25.0), and (258.0±122.6) mg·kg-1 for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn, respectively, which were remarkably higher than of those from other regions within Guangxi Province and China. In comparison to China''s soil environmental quality standard risk screening values (GB 15618-2018), the over-standard rates of Cd, As, and Cr were 95.6%, 86.8%, and 69.1%, respectively. In comparison to risk intervention values, the over-standard rates of Cd, As, and Cr were 27.9%, 17.6%, and 5.9%, respectively. Speciation analysis on heavy metals indicated that As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn were mainly found in a residual form, and accounted for>80% of the total concentrations, and had a low bioavailability. The bioactive components (F1+F2+F3) of Cd accounted for 21%, and the bioactivity of Cd was higher than other elements. The potential bioavailable components (F4+F5+F6) of Hg accounted for 44%, with low total concentrations, which are understood to have little potential ecological harm for crops. However, the over-standard rates of Pb, Cd, and Cr in rice grains were only 23.5%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between the concentrations of heavy metals in soils and the corresponding rice grains. The mean BCFs of each heavy metal were <0.1, and the BCFs of Hg, Pb, As, Cr, and Ni were <0.05. Overall, we found relatively high concentrations, low activity, and low ecological risks for heavy metals in the study area. For high geological background materials such as carbonate rocks, factors such as metal speciation, biological activity, and crop over-standard rates should be taken into account along with the traditional use of the total amount of heavy metals in a soil as the evaluation standard when formulating pollution control policies.
Keywords:carbonate rocks  soil-crop system  speciation of heavy metals  bioavailability  bioconcentration factor
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号