首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Effects of different management strategies on long-term trends of Australian threatened and near-threatened mammals
Authors:Ayesha I. T. Tulloch  Micha V. Jackson  Elisa Bayraktarov  Alexander R. Carey  Diego F. Correa-Gomez  Michael Driessen  Ian C. Gynther  Mel Hardie  Katherine Moseby  Liana Joseph  Harriet Preece  Andrés Felipe Suarez-Castro  Stephanie Stuart  John C. Z. Woinarski  Hugh P. Possingham
Affiliation:1. School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia;2. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia;3. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Research, Specialised and Data Foundations, Digital Solutions, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia;4. Saving our Species Program, Department of the Environment, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia;5. Conservation Science Section, Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia;6. Department of Environment and Science, Moggill, Queensland, Australia

Biodiversity and Geosciences Program, Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia;7. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;8. Arid Recovery, Roxby Downs, South Australia, Australia;9. Australian Wildlife Conservancy, Subiaco East, Western Australia, Australia;10. Department of Environment and Science, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia;11. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia;12. Saving our Species Program, Department of the Environment, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;13. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia;14. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA

Abstract:Monitoring is critical to assess management effectiveness, but broadscale systematic assessments of monitoring to evaluate and improve recovery efforts are lacking. We compiled 1808 time series from 71 threatened and near-threatened terrestrial and volant mammal species and subspecies in Australia (48% of all threatened mammal taxa) to compare relative trends of populations subject to different management strategies. We adapted the Living Planet Index to develop the Threatened Species Index for Australian Mammals and track aggregate trends for all sampled threatened mammal populations and for small (<35 g), medium (35–5500 g), and large mammals (>5500 g) from 2000 to 2017. Unmanaged populations (42 taxa) declined by 63% on average; unmanaged small mammals exhibited the greatest declines (96%). Populations of 17 taxa in havens (islands and fenced areas that excluded or eliminated introduced red foxes [Vulpes vulpes] and domestic cats [Felis catus]) increased by 680%. Outside havens, populations undergoing sustained predator baiting initially declined by 75% but subsequently increased to 47% of their abundance in 2000. At sites where predators were not excluded or baited but other actions (e.g., fire management, introduced herbivore control) occurred, populations of small and medium mammals declined faster, but large mammals declined more slowly, than unmanaged populations. Only 13% of taxa had data for both unmanaged and managed populations; index comparisons for this subset showed that taxa with populations increasing inside havens declined outside havens but taxa with populations subject to predator baiting outside havens declined more slowly than populations with no management and then increased, whereas unmanaged populations continued to decline. More comprehensive and improved monitoring (particularly encompassing poorly represented management actions and taxonomic groups like bats and small mammals) is required to understand whether and where management has worked. Improved implementation of management for threats other than predation is critical to recover Australia's threatened mammals.
Keywords:biodiversity conservation  invasive predator control  Living Planet Index  long-term ecological monitoring  management effectiveness  population trends  predator-free havens  threatened species  conservación de la biodiversidad  control de depredadores invasores  especie amenazada  efectividad de manejo  Índice Planeta Vivo  monitoreo ecológico a largo plazo  refugios libres de depredadores  tendencias poblacionales  生物多样性保护  地球生命力指数(Living Planet Index)  入侵捕食者控制  受威胁物种  种群趋势  管理有效性  长期生态监测  无捕食者避难所
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号