首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Linking agricultural adaptation strategies,food security and vulnerability: evidence from West Africa
Authors:Sabine Douxchamps  Mark T. Van Wijk  Silvia Silvestri  Abdoulaye S. Moussa  Carlos Quiros  Ndèye Yacine B. Ndour  Saaka Buah  Léopold Somé  Mario Herrero  Patricia Kristjanson  Mathieu Ouedraogo  Philip K. Thornton  Piet Van Asten  Robert Zougmoré  Mariana C. Rufino
Affiliation:1.International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), c/o CIFOR,Ouagadougou 06,Burkina Faso;2.International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI),Nairobi,Kenya;3.International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT),Bamako,Mali;4.Institut Sénégalais de Recherche Agricole (ISRA),Dakar,Senegal;5.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (CSIR-SARI),Wa,Ghana;6.Institut National de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA),Kaboinsé,Burkina Faso;7.Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO),St Lucia,Australia;8.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF),Nairobi,Kenya;9.CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), ILRI,Nairobi,Kenya;10.International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA),Kampala,Uganda;11.Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR),Nairobi,Kenya
Abstract:Adaptation strategies to reduce smallholder farmers’ vulnerability to climate variability and seasonality are needed given the frequency of extreme weather events predicted to increase during the next decades in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in West Africa. We explored the linkages between selected agricultural adaptation strategies (crop diversity, soil and water conservation, trees on farm, small ruminants, improved crop varieties, fertilizers), food security, farm household characteristics and farm productivity in three contrasting agro-ecological sites in West Africa (Burkina Faso, Ghana and Senegal). Differences in land area per capita and land productivity largely explained the variation in food security across sites. Based on land size and market orientation, four household types were distinguished (subsistence, diversified, extensive, intensified), with contrasting levels of food security and agricultural adaptation strategies. Income increased steadily with land size, and both income and land productivity increased with degree of market orientation. The adoption of agricultural adaptation strategies was widespread, although the intensity of practice varied across household types. Adaptation strategies improve the food security status of some households, but not all. Some strategies had a significant positive impact on land productivity, while others reduced vulnerability resulting in a more stable cash flow throughout the year. Our results show that for different household types, different adaptation strategies may be ‘climate-smart’. The typology developed in this study gives a good entry point to analyse which practices should be targeted to which type of smallholder farmers, and quantifies the effect of adaptation options on household food security. Subsequently, it will be crucial to empower farmers to access, test and modify these adaptation options, if they were to achieve higher levels of food security.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号