Life cycle assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plant with post-combustion carbon capture,transport and storage |
| |
Authors: | Bhawna Singh Anders H. Strømman Edgar Hertwich |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada;2. ArticCan Energy Services, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada;1. College of Management & Economics Studies, University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, Dehradun, India;2. Department of Natural Resources, TERI University, New Delhi 110070, India;3. Department of Energy and Environment, TERI University, New Delhi 110070, India;1. Life Cycle Strategies, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;2. The Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC), Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3055, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Hybrid life cycle assessment has been used to assess the environmental impacts of natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) electricity generation with carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). The CCS chain modeled in this study consists of carbon dioxide (CO2) capture from flue gas using monoethanolamine (MEA), pipeline transport and storage in a saline aquifer.Results show that the sequestration of 90% CO2 from the flue gas results in avoiding 70% of CO2 emissions to the atmosphere per kWh and reduces global warming potential (GWP) by 64%. Calculation of other environmental impacts shows the trade-offs: an increase of 43% in acidification, 35% in eutrophication, and 120–170% in various toxicity impacts. Given the assumptions employed in this analysis, emissions of MEA and formaldehyde during capture process and generation of reclaimer wastes contributes to various toxicity potentials and cause many-fold increase in the on-site direct freshwater ecotoxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity impacts. NOx from fuel combustion is still the dominant contributor to most direct impacts, other than toxicity potentials and GWP. It is found that the direct emission of MEA contribute little to human toxicity (HT < 1%), however it makes 16% of terrestrial ecotoxicity impact. Hazardous reclaimer waste causes significant freshwater and marine ecotoxicity impacts. Most increases in impact are due to increased fuel requirements or increased investments and operating inputs.The reductions in GWP range from 58% to 68% for the worst-case to best-case CCS system. Acidification, eutrophication and toxicity potentials show an even large range of variation in the sensitivity analysis. Decreases in energy use and solvent degradation will significantly reduce the impact in all categories. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|