首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Estimating the Cumulative Ecological Effect of Local Scale Landscape Changes in South Florida
Authors:Dianna?M.?Hogan  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:dhogan@usgs.gov"   title="  dhogan@usgs.gov"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,William?Labiosa,Leonard?Pearlstine,David?Hallac,David?Strong,Paul?Hearn,Richard?Bernknopf
Affiliation:(1) US Geological Survey, Eastern Geographic Science Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MSN 521, Reston, Virginia, 20192, USA;(2) US Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Seattle, Washington, USA;(3) National Park Service, Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Parks, Homestead, Florida, USA;(4) US Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Menlo Park, California, USA;(5) Present address: Yellowstone Center for Resources, PO Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190, USA;(6) Present address: Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Abstract:Ecosystem restoration in south Florida is a state and national priority centered on the Everglades wetlands. However, urban development pressures affect the restoration potential and remaining habitat functions of the natural undeveloped areas. Land use (LU) planning often focuses at the local level, but a better understanding of the cumulative effects of small projects at the landscape level is needed to support ecosystem restoration and preservation. The South Florida Ecosystem Portfolio Model (SFL EPM) is a regional LU planning tool developed to help stakeholders visualize LU scenario evaluation and improve communication about regional effects of LU decisions. One component of the SFL EPM is ecological value (EV), which is evaluated through modeled ecological criteria related to ecosystem services using metrics for (1) biodiversity potential, (2) threatened and endangered species, (3) rare and unique habitats, (4) landscape pattern and fragmentation, (5) water quality buffer potential, and (6) ecological restoration potential. In this article, we demonstrate the calculation of EV using two case studies: (1) assessing altered EV in the Biscayne Gateway area by comparing 2004 LU to potential LU in 2025 and 2050, and (2) the cumulative impact of adding limestone mines south of Miami. Our analyses spatially convey changing regional EV resulting from conversion of local natural and agricultural areas to urban, industrial, or extractive use. Different simulated local LU scenarios may result in different alterations in calculated regional EV. These case studies demonstrate methods that may facilitate evaluation of potential future LU patterns and incorporate EV into decision making.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号