首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Climate Change,Marine Environments,and the U.S. Endangered Species Act
Authors:ERIN E SENEY  MELANIE J ROWLAND  RUTH ANN LOWERY  ROGER B GRIFFIS  MICHELLE M McCLURE
Institution:1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Science and Technology, , Silver Spring, MD, 20910 U.S.A.;2. Erin Seney Consulting, LLC, , Woodbridge, VA, 22192 U.S.A.;3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of the General Counsel, , Seattle, WA, U.S.A. (retired);4. Melanie J. Rowland Consulting, Twisp, , WA, 98856 U.S.A.;5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of General Counsel, Fisheries and Protected Resources Section, , Silver Spring, MD, 20910 U.S.A.;6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, , Seattle, WA, 98112 U.S.A.
Abstract:Climate change is expected to be a top driver of global biodiversity loss in the 21st century. It poses new challenges to conserving and managing imperiled species, particularly in marine and estuarine ecosystems. The use of climate‐related science in statutorily driven species management, such as under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), is in its early stages. This article provides an overview of ESA processes, with emphasis on the mandate to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to manage listed marine, estuarine, and anadromous species. Although the ESA is specific to the United States, its requirements are broadly relevant to conservation planning. Under the ESA, species, subspecies, and “distinct population segments” may be listed as either endangered or threatened, and taking of most listed species (harassing, harming, pursuing, wounding, killing, or capturing) is prohibited unless specifically authorized via a case‐by‐case permit process. Government agencies, in addition to avoiding take, must ensure that actions they fund, authorize, or conduct are not likely to jeopardize a listed species’ continued existence or adversely affect designated critical habitat. Decisions for which climate change is likely to be a key factor include: determining whether a species should be listed under the ESA, designating critical habitat areas, developing species recovery plans, and predicting whether effects of proposed human activities will be compatible with ESA‐listed species’ survival and recovery. Scientific analyses that underlie these critical conservation decisions include risk assessment, long‐term recovery planning, defining environmental baselines, predicting distribution, and defining appropriate temporal and spatial scales. Although specific guidance is still evolving, it is clear that the unprecedented changes in global ecosystems brought about by climate change necessitate new information and approaches to conservation of imperiled species. El Cambio Climático, los Ecosistemas Marinos y el Acta Estadunidense de Especies en Peligro
Keywords:anadromous species  critical habitat  environmental assessment  imperiled species  interagency consultation  ocean acidification  recovery plan  uncertainty  acidificació  n oceá  nica  consulta interagencias  especies aná  dromas  especies en peligro  estudios ambientales    bitat crí  tico  incertidumbre  plan de recuperació  n
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号