首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

碳质气溶胶(OC/EC)新型观测方法对比分析
引用本文:倪登峰,林晶晶,高健,解静芳,王杰,郭英哲,任建宁. 碳质气溶胶(OC/EC)新型观测方法对比分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(12): 5191-5197
作者姓名:倪登峰  林晶晶  高健  解静芳  王杰  郭英哲  任建宁
作者单位:1. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012;2. 山西大学环境与资源学院, 山西 太原 030006;3. 山东省生态环境监测中心, 山东 济南 250101;4. 北京化工大学环境科学与工程系, 北京 100029;5. 山东大学环境研究院, 山东 青岛 266237
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(91544226)
摘    要:基于热光反射法(IMPROVE A)和热光透射法(RT-Quartz)二种协议分析方法和新型OC/EC分析方法对济南市碳质气溶胶含量进行了对比观测.结果表明,协议方法在OC/EC的观测过程中因分析定义会造成碳质气溶胶质量浓度高估或者低估,且膜采样系统使离线分析的OC约为在线的1.65倍,而新型OC/EC测量方法相对于2种协议方法,去除了原理上和环境参数(如VOCs)可能导致的误差,在OC/EC/TC测量结果上均有一定优势,在实际运行中更具有准确性、稳定性和实用性,更加适合颗粒物中OC/EC长期业务化在线测量.

关 键 词:PM2.5  碳质气溶胶  热光法  CASS  对比分析  
收稿时间:2020-04-20

Comparative analysis of new observation methods for carbonaceous aerosol (OC/EC)
NI Deng-feng,LIN Jing-jing,GAO Jian,XIE Jing-fang,WANG Jie,GUO Ying-zhe,REN Jian-ning. Comparative analysis of new observation methods for carbonaceous aerosol (OC/EC)[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(12): 5191-5197
Authors:NI Deng-feng  LIN Jing-jing  GAO Jian  XIE Jing-fang  WANG Jie  GUO Ying-zhe  REN Jian-ning
Affiliation:1. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;2. College of Environmental & Resource Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;3. Shandong Provincial Eco-environment Monitoring Center, Jinan 250101, China;4. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China;5. Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
Abstract:Based on two protocol analysis methods, Thermo-light reflection method (IMPROVE A) and Thermo-optical transmission method (RT-Quartz), and the new OC/EC analysis method, comparative analysis of carbonaceous aerosol content in Jinan was held in this study. The results show that the protocol methods may lead to overestimation or underestimation of the carbonaceous aerosol mass concentration due to the analysis definition during OC/EC observation process, furthermore, the membrane sampling system made the offline OC about 1.65times online. Compared with the two protocol methods, the new OC/EC measurement method does eliminate the errors that may be caused by principle and environmental parameters (such as VOCs), and has certain advantages in the measurement of OC/EC/TC. With more accuracy, stability and practicality in practical operation, the new method will be more suitable for long-term commercial online measurement of OC/EC in particles.
Keywords:PM2.5  carbonaceous aerosol  thermal-optical methods  CASS  comparative analysis  
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号