首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

企业安全管理体系标准模式的比较研究
引用本文:苗金明,冯志斌,周心权. 企业安全管理体系标准模式的比较研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(10)
作者姓名:苗金明  冯志斌  周心权
作者单位:1. 中国矿业大学,北京,资源与安全工程学院,北京,100083
2. 北京安创管理顾问有限公司,北京,100013
摘    要:采用对比分析法和实证分析法,对当前国内外流行的企业安全管理体系标准模式及其评价方法进行比较研究,旨在把握诸多标准模式的原则、路径、结构、方法和共性特征及其可以发挥的具体优点,将研究的标准模式的评价方法归纳为两大类即体系认证审核法和综合考评打分法,并对两类评价方法的优缺点进行剖析。体系认证审核法的优点是过程方法、符合性及抽样,考评打分法则提供了安全绩效准则。对吸收融合两类评价方法的优点形成综合性评价方法的途径和方式进行了探讨,为企业建立有效、适用的安全管理体系提供了依据。

关 键 词:安全管理体系(SMS)  标准模式  比较  体系认证审核法  综合考评打分法

Comparative Study on the Standard Modes of Enterprise Safety Management System
MIAO Jin-ming,FENG Zhi-bin,ZHOU Xin-quan. Comparative Study on the Standard Modes of Enterprise Safety Management System[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(10)
Authors:MIAO Jin-ming  FENG Zhi-bin  ZHOU Xin-quan
Abstract:In order to hold the principles, paths, structure, methods and common characteristics of various standard modes of safety management system at home and abroad, a comparative study is made among these modes by using contrastive analytical method and empirical analytical method. The study shows that the assessment methods for all the standard modes can be reduced to system certification auditing method and comprehensive check marking method. The advantages of the former are to adopt the process method, conformance and sampling principles; and the latter provides safety performance criterion. Finally, how to form a comprehensive assessment method by absorbing the advantages of the two assessment methods is explored. This study provides basis for enterprises to establish an effective and proper safety management system.
Keywords:safety management system(SMS)   standard modes   comparison  system certification auditing method   comprehensive check marking method
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号