首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

复合填料土壤渗滤系统处理农村生活污水的效果
引用本文:张思, 宁国辉, 杨铮铮, 李昊阳, 谢建治. 复合填料土壤渗滤系统处理农村生活污水的效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(11): 4625-4630.
作者姓名:张思  宁国辉  杨铮铮  李昊阳  谢建治
作者单位:1.河北农业大学资源与环境科学学院, 河北省农田生态环境重点实验室, 保定 071001; 2.北京林业大学生物科学与技术学院, 北京 100083
基金项目:国家“水体污染控制与治理”科技重大专项(2008ZX07209-008-005,2008ZX07209-007-05);国家科技支撑计划项日(2007BAD87B04)
摘    要:为了加强农村生活污水综合治理,本研究以农村生活污水为研究对象,选择了以粉煤灰和腐熟牛粪作为填料配合土壤的2套不同装填方式的土壤渗滤系统,分别用于去除污水中的COD、总磷、总氮和氨氮.系统1对COD、总磷、总氮和氨氮的平均去除率分别为85.8%、98.1%、78.4%和93.7%,系统2的去除率分别为87.1%、96.0%、73.4%和95.5%.结果表明,两系统对污水中的污染物均有较好的去除效果.通过方差分析比较两系统的去除效果发现,装填方式对COD去除效果影响不大,而对总磷、总氮和氨氮的去除效果差异显著.但从污水处理效果综合比较,以分层装填方式的系统1对污染物的去除效果优于全混合装填方式的系统2.

关 键 词:复合填料   土壤渗滤系统   农村分散生活污水   去除效果
收稿时间:2014-01-07

Effect of rural decentralized sewage treatment by composite filler SIS
Zhang Si, Ning Guohui, Yang Zhengzheng, Li Haoyang, Xie Jianzhi. Effect of rural decentralized sewage treatment by composite filler SIS[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(11): 4625-4630.
Authors:Zhang Si  Ning Guohui  Yang Zhengzheng  Li Haoyang  Xie Jianzhi
Affiliation:1.Key Laboratory for Hebei Farrnland Ecological Environment, College of Resources and Environment Science, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, China; 2.College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:In order to strengthen the comprehensive management of rural sewage, two soil infiltration systems (SIS) were established to examine their removals for COD, total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN) and ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N) in rural sewage, where the fly ash was layered at two different depths of the column filled with soil-decomposed cow dung mixture in system 1(S1) and was fully mixed with the soil-decomposed cow dung mixture in system 2(S2). The average removal rates of COD, TP, TN, NH3-N for S1 were 85.8%, 98.1%, 78.4% and 93.7%, respectively, and for S2 were 87.1%, 96.0%, 73.4% and 96.0%, respectively. Among the removal effects of these two systems, significant difference in the TP, TN and NH3-N removal but little effect on COD were observed. From the comprehensive comparison of these two sewage treatments, S1 had better removal effect than S2.
Keywords:composite filler  soil infiltration system  rural decentralized domestic sewage  removal effect
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号