Can food safety policy-making be both
scientifically and democratically legitimated?
If so,how? |
| |
Authors: | Erik Millstone |
| |
Institution: | (1) SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QE, England |
| |
Abstract: | This paper provides an analysis of the evolution of thinking and talking about the role of scientific knowledge and expertise
in food safety policy-making, and in risk policy-making more generally from the late 19th century to the present day. It highlights
the defining characteristics of several models that have been used to represent and interpret the relations between policy-makers
and expert scientific advisors and between scientific and political considerations. Both conceptual and empirical strengths
and weaknesses of those models are identified, focusing in particular on the ways in which they deal with scientific uncertainties
and social choices. By drawing on both empirical evidence and conceptual analysis, a novel and more realistic model is provided
along with an account of some conditions for food safety policy-making achieving both scientific and democratic legitimacy. |
| |
Keywords: | democratic legitimacy public policy science scientific legitimacy |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|