A three-trophic level estuarine model: Synergism of two mechanistic simulations

Few numerical simulations have attempted to include a high degree of biological detail for several trophic levels. Typically, in planktonic ecosystem models, if the dynamics of nutrients, phytoplankton and herbivorous zooplankton are formulated with ecological complexity, then carnivores are ignored, forced or modeled in an extremely simplified manner. Extensive mechanistic detail for important carnivores is difficult to represent because reliable and relevant ecological data are rarely available for appropriate species and local populations. Further, the wide temporal and spatial differences between life histories of lower plankton and carnivores may be technically difficult to model.In Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi is an important carnivore to which these objections do not apply. A detailed carbon-based simulation model of this population of ctenophores was developed independently from an ecosystem model of Narragansett Bay which included detailed interactions between phytoplankton, primarily herbivorous zooplankton and nutrients. The interfacing of these two models without changing any of the formulations or values of the coefficients provided a test of the commonly used practice of forcing certain components. Both models were originally constructed with the biomass of a critical compartment forced according to observed data; in the plankton model, ctenophores were forced, and in the ctenophore model, zooplankton were forced.Predicted biomasses for zooplankton and ctenophores in the combined model were similar to the results of the two parent models, but improved relative to the actual field observations. From the findings it appears that the strategy of forcing is valid provided the forced patterns are appropriate and reasonable.