首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

铝酸盐材料对镉污染土壤的稳定化修复及其机理
引用本文:沈连峰, 陆夏梓, 贾睿琪, 李璞, 吕正勇, 姚晨, 赵艳阳, 郭虹妤, 李烜桢. 铝酸盐材料对镉污染土壤的稳定化修复及其机理[J]. 环境工程学报, 2022, 16(5): 1620-1628. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202109138
作者姓名:沈连峰  陆夏梓  贾睿琪  李璞  吕正勇  姚晨  赵艳阳  郭虹妤  李烜桢
作者单位:1.河南农业大学林学院,郑州 450002; 2.河南省地质环境勘查院,郑州 450051; 3.南京尚土生态环境有限公司,南京 210000; 4.河南农业大学国际教育学院,郑州 450002
摘    要:为研究铝酸盐材料对于修复Cd污染土壤的可行性,以常见的硅酸盐材料为参照,比较了两者对土壤中Cd的稳定化效果,并对相关反应机制进行了讨论。结果表明:当土壤中Cd的质量分数为54.6 mg·kg−1时,铝酸盐和硅酸盐材料使Cd的7 d浸出质量浓度分别降低58.07%~77.75%和63.46%~93.02%,180 d浸出质量浓度分别降低28.72%~79.23%和41.08%~86.63%;当土壤中Cd的质量分数为2 940.03 mg·kg−1时,铝酸盐和硅酸盐材料使Cd的7 d浸出质量浓度分别降低76.97%~93.15%和19.05%~94.38%,180 d浸出质量浓度分别降低56.56%~88.87%和-32.68%~49.79%。这说明铝酸盐材料对土壤中Cd的稳定化效果优于硅酸盐材料。在CdCl2溶液中(94.02 mg·L−1),铝酸盐和硅酸盐材料分别使Cd质量浓度降低了99.92%~99.93%和99.68%~99.92%,并使pH分别增大了6.56~6.81和7.01~7.69。通过SEM-EDS、FTIR、XRD和XPS等分析手段发现,铝酸盐材料可通过水化反应生成Ca—Si—H和Ca—Al—Si—H凝胶,以实现对Cd的物理包裹和吸附,并可通过使pH增大而生成Cd(OH)2、CdO或CdCO3沉淀,进而实现了对Cd的稳定化。本研究表明铝酸盐材料较硅酸盐材料对Cd的稳定化更为高效且长效,可为Cd污染土壤修复提供参考。

关 键 词:铝酸盐材料     土壤修复   稳定化
收稿时间:2021-09-23

Stabilization and remediation of Cadmium contaminated soil by Aluminate and its mechanisms
SHEN Lianfeng, LU Xiazi, JIA Ruiqi, LI Pu, LYU Zhengyong, YAO Chen, ZHAO Yanyang, GUO Hongyu, LI Xuanzhen. Stabilization and remediation of Cadmium contaminated soil by Aluminate and its mechanisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 1620-1628. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.202109138
Authors:SHEN Lianfeng  LU Xiazi  JIA Ruiqi  LI Pu  LYU Zhengyong  YAO Chen  ZHAO Yanyang  GUO Hongyu  LI Xuanzhen
Affiliation:1.College of Forestry of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2.Henan Institute of Geo-Environment Exploration, Zhengzhou 450051, China; 3.Nanjing Shangtu Ecological Environment Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210000, China; 4.International Education College, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
Abstract:In order to explore the feasibility of aluminate in cadmium contaminated soil remediation, the stabilization effects of aluminate material on cadmium polluted soil were compared with traditional silicate material, and the related reacion mechanism was expounded. The results showed that when the mass fraction of Cd was 54.6 mg·kg−1, the leaching mass concentration of Cd at 7 d decreased by 58.07%~77.75% and 63.46%~93.02% with aluminate and silicate materails, respectively, and the leaching mass concentration at 180 decreased by 28.72%~79.23% and 41.08%~86.63%, respectively.. When the mass fraction of Cd was 2 940.03 mg·kg−1, the leaching mass concentration of Cd at 7 d decreased by 76.97%~93.15% and 19.05%~94.38% with aluminate and silicate materails, respectively, and the leaching mass concentration of Cd at 180d decreased by 56.56%~88.87% and −32.68%~49.79%, respectively. These results indicated that aluminate material was more efficient in stabilization of cadmium in soil than silicate material. In CdCl2 solution (94.02 mg·L−1), aluminate and silicate reduced Cd concentration by 99.92%~99.93% and 99.68%~99.92%, respectively, and increased pH by 6.56~6.81 and 7.01~7.69, respectively. Through SEM-EDS, FTIR, XRD and XPS analysis, it was found that aluminate could form Ca—Si—H and Ca—Al—Si—H gels through hydration reaction to achieve physical encapsulating and adsorption of Cd. In addition, aluminate could also increase pH to generate Cd(OH)2, CdO or CdCO3 to realize the stabization of Cd. In conclusion, aluminate was more efficient and long-term in stabilization of cadmium than silicate, which can provide reference for the remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil.
Keywords:aluminate  cadmium  soil remediation  stabilization
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号