首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

河流健康评价中不同标准化方法的应用与比较
引用本文:周莹,渠晓东,赵瑞,马淑芹,张远,殷旭旺.河流健康评价中不同标准化方法的应用与比较[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(4):410-417.
作者姓名:周莹  渠晓东  赵瑞  马淑芹  张远  殷旭旺
作者单位:1.大连海洋大学水产与生命学院, 辽宁省水生生物学重点实验室, 辽宁 大连116023
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项
摘    要:年5月与2010年5—6月对浑太河流域开展大型底栖动物野外生态调查,分别使用水质法(水质指标标准化法)、栖境法(栖息地质量评价指标标准化法)和综合法(水质与栖息地质量评价指标结合的标准化法)筛选参照点和受损点,构建IBI(生物完整性指数)以对研究区域的健康状况作出评价. 结果表明:不同标准化方法筛选的参照点与受损点不同,其中,水质法与栖境法筛选的参照点与受损点数量多于综合法. 不同标准化方法构建的IBI核心参数不同,仅有4个参数〔总分类单元数、EPT分类单元数(蜉蝣目、積翅目、毛翅目三目昆虫分类单元数之和)、耐污类群相对丰度和黏附者相对丰度〕为3种方法所共有. 不同标准化方法对河流健康的评价结果不同,其中,水质法与栖境法对浑太河健康状况的评价等级整体高于综合法. 比较不同标准化方法选择参照点的准确率可知,栖境法的准确率(75%)优于水质法(50%)和综合法(67%);而在选择受损点的准确率中,水质法(100%)和综合法(100%)均优于栖境法(89%). 

关 键 词:标准化方法    参照点和受损点    IBI(生物完整性指数)    核心参数    河流健康评价
收稿时间:2012/11/19 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/2/4 0:00:00

Standardized Methods for Selecting Reference and Impaired Sites to Evaluate River Health
ZHOU Ying,QU Xiao-dong,ZHAO Rui,MA Shu-qin,ZHANG Yuan and YIN Xu-wang.Standardized Methods for Selecting Reference and Impaired Sites to Evaluate River Health[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2013,26(4):410-417.
Authors:ZHOU Ying  QU Xiao-dong  ZHAO Rui  MA Shu-qin  ZHANG Yuan and YIN Xu-wang
Institution:1.Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory for Hydrobiology, College of Fisheries and Life Science, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China2.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Laboratory of Riverine Ecological Conservation & Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Abstract:In May 2009and from May to June in 2010, a survey of aquatic organisms was carried out in Huntai River basin. A study using three quantitative methods for selecting reference sites and impaired sites was conducted to create the index of biological integrity (IBI) based on community data of macroinvertebrates, and to further evaluate the river health of the selected region. The three criteria included water quality parameters, habitat quality evaluation, and assessment of integrated water quality and habitat quality. When different reference and impaired sites were selected with different methods, either water quality criteria or habitat quality criteria selected more sites as reference than the integrated criteria. A significant difference was observed in constructing the IBI core metrics, as only four parameters (i.e., total taxa, EPT taxa, relative abundance of tolerant taxa, and relative abundance of clingers) were common among all three criteria. The assessment results showed that Huntai River was under better condition when assessed with either water quality criteria or habitat quality criteria, but under worse condition when assessed with the integrated criteria. Additionally, habitat quality criteria showed a higher accuracy rate (75%) than either water quality or integrated criteria (50% and 67%, respectively) in selecting the reference sites, while for the impaired sites, water quality (100%) and integrated criteria (100%) had a higher accuracy rate than habitat evaluation (89%).
Keywords:standard methodology  reference and impaired sites  index of biological integrity (IBI)  core metrics  river health assessment
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号