Community air monitoring for pesticides. Part 1: selecting pesticides and a community |
| |
Authors: | Randy Segawa Johanna Levine Rosemary Neal Madeline Brattesani |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Environmental Monitoring Branch, California Department of Pesticide Regulation, CA Environmental Protection Agency, P.O. Box 4015, Sacramento, CA, 95812, USA 2. Mobile Source Control Division, Air Resources Board, CA Environmental Protection Agency, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, CA, 95812, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | The CA Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) developed methods to select pesticides and a community to fulfill criteria for an ambient air monitoring study it conducted as part of the CA Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Action Plan. Using a scoring system, CDPR evaluated 100 pesticides based on statewide-reported pesticide use, volatility, and priority in CDPR's risk assessment process (indicators of exposure and toxicity) to produce a list of pesticides to consider as candidates for monitoring. The CDPR also evaluated and scored 83 communities based on demographics and health factors, availability of cumulative impacts data, and reported pesticide use to create a list of community candidates. The scores provide relative rankings to distinguish more highly impacted communities from less impacted ones and to identify which pesticides might contribute most to potential adverse health effects. These methods use criteria that can be quantified, validated, and verified in order to provide a transparent and fair selection process. Based on public comments and highest scores, CDPR recommended 40 pesticides (including some of their degradation products) and one community for its yearlong monitoring study. The CDPR then further refined its list of pesticides by soliciting input from local and technical advisory groups. The CDPR plans to use these methods to select pesticides and communities in future monitoring activities. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|