Carbon dioxide pipelines: A statistical analysis of historical accidents |
| |
| Institution: | 1. China-Pakistan Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Smart Disaster Prevention of Major Infrastructures, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China;2. School of Safety and Ocean Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, 102249, China;3. Trenchless Technology Center, Louisiana Tech University, LA, 71270, United States;1. College of Petroleum & Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, 610500, PR China;2. Key Laboratory of Deep Underground Science and Engineering (Ministry of Education), College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610500, PR China;3. Sichuan Development Guorun Water Investment Co., Ltd., Chengdu, 610500, PR China;4. Petroleum Engineering Supervision Center of Southwest Petroleum Branch, SINOPEC, No. 398, South Taishan Road, Jingyang District, Deyang 618000, China;1. Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China;2. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China;1. Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, Nancy, France;2. INERIS, Parc Technologique ALATA, BP 2, F-60550, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France;1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131, Padova, Italy;2. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Chimica, Ambientale e dei Materiali, Università degli studi di Bologna, Via Terracini 28, 40131, Bologna, Italy;3. Corpo Nazionale dei Vigili del Fuoco Comando Venezia, Via Motorizzazione 7, 37100, Venezia, Italy;4. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e Ambientale, Via Marzolo 9, 35131, Padova, Italy;1. Hunan University of Science and Technology, School of Resource, Environment and Safety Engineering, Xiangtan, Hunan, 411201, China;2. Central South University, School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Changsha, Hunan, 410083, China;1. College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350116, China;2. Fujian Provincial Institute of Architectural Design and Research CO. LTD., Fuzhou, 350001, China;3. Safety and Security Science Group, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft, 2628 BX, Delft, the Netherlands;4. Faculty of Applied Economics, Antwerp Research Group on Safety and Security (ARGoSS), Universiteit Antwerpen, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium;5. CEDON, KULeuven, 1000, Brussels, Belgium |
| |
| Abstract: | Carbon dioxide pipeline is an essential carrier in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). Statistically revealing the accident rate and risk of carbon dioxide pipelines is conducive to integrity management. Based on 112 accident records collected from Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, this work analyzes the frequency, rate, and risk of accidents. In addition, the impact of relevant factors on risk is further discussed. Some primary conclusions are as follows: (1) For carbon dioxide pipelines, the leak is the leading form of accident. Most carbon emissions are generated in the form of leakage, but economic losses are mainly generated in other forms. (2) The pipelines that have been in service for 0–10 years have the highest frequency of accidents and the highest proportion of carbon emissions, but the pipelines that have been in service for 11–20 years have caused the most economic losses. (3) Among the accident causes, the number of accidents caused by equipment failure is the highest, while the economic loss caused by natural force damage is the highest, and the carbon emission caused by material failure is the highest. |
| |
| Keywords: | Carbon dioxide pipeline Statistical analysis Pipeline accident Accident risk |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
