An intercomparison of formaldehyde measurement techniques at ambient concentration

A study was conducted to evaluate five techniques for determining ambient formaldehyde concentrations. One technique used a spectroscopic determination, and the other four techniques used derivatization followed by fluorometric analysis or high-performance liquid chromatography with detection by u.v. absorption. Formaldehyde was generated by two techniques. In the first technique, zero air was bubbled through a solution of aqueous formaldehyde to produce gas-phase formaldehyde. Various compounds serving as possible interferences were added singly or in combination to these air mixtures. In the second technique, formaldehyde was generated as a product from controlled irradiations of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides in a smog chamber operated in a dynamic mode. The study was conducted as a blind intercomparison with no knowledge by the participants of the HCHO concentrations or the interferences added.The data from each of the techniques were compared against mean values in each sampling period. For formaldehyde in zero air, average deviations for each of the techniques ranged between 15 and 30%. At a formaldehyde concentration of 10 ppb, each technique showed no evidence for interferences by O₃ (190 ppbv), NO₂ (300 ppbv), SO₂ (20 ppbv), and H₂O₂ (7 ppbv). The agreement for formaldehyde concentrations measured for the photochemical mixtures was similar to that of the mixtures in zero air.Ambient measurements were also performed on three evenings and for one 36-h period. Ambient formaldehyde concentrations ranged from 1 to 10 ppbv. Ambient H₂O₂ measurements were also performed. A strong correlation in the diurnal concentration profile for formaldehyde and H₂O₂ was observed over the 36-h period.