首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A simple urban dispersion model tested with tracer data from Oklahoma City and Manhattan
Authors:Steven Hanna  Emmanuel Baja
Institution:1. Shell Projects and Technology, Rijswijk, The Netherlands;2. Shell Projects and Technology, Thornton, UK;3. Shell Projects and Technology, Houston, USA;4. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA;1. WG Environmental Health, Unit for Physiology and Biophysics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A 1210 Vienna, Austria;2. Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Department of Environmental Meteorology, Hohe Warte 38, A 1190 Vienna, Austria;1. Duke University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Durham, NC 27708, USA;2. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 109 TW Alexander Drive, E343-02, RTP, NC 27711, USA
Abstract:A simple urban dispersion model is tested that is based on the Gaussian plume model and modifications to the Briggs urban dispersion curves. An initial dispersion coefficient (σo) of 40 m is assumed to apply in built-up downtown areas, and the stability is assumed to be slightly unstable during the day and slightly stable during the night. Observations from tracer experiments during the Joint Urban 2003 (JU2003) field study in Oklahoma City and the Madison Square Garden 2005 (MSG05) field study in Manhattan are used for model testing. The tracer SF6 was released during JU2003 near ground level in the downtown area and concentrations were observed at over 100 locations within 4 km from the source. Six perfluorocarbon tracer (PFT) gases were released near ground level during MSG05 and sampled by about 20 samplers at the surface and on building roofs. The evaluations compare concentrations normalized by source release rate, C/Q, for each sampler location and each tracer release, where data were used only if both the observed and predicted concentrations exceeded threshold levels. At JU2003, for all samplers and release times, the fractional mean bias (FB) is about 0.2 during the day (20% mean underprediction) and 0.0 during the night. About 45 –50% of the predictions are within a factor of two (FAC2) of the observations day and night at JU2003. The maximum observed C/Q is about two times the maximum predicted C/Q both day and night. At MSG05, for all PFTs, surface samplers, and release times, FB is 0.14 and FAC2 is about 45%. The overall 60 min-averaged maximum C/Q is underpredicted by about 40% for the surface samplers and is overpredicted by about 25% for the building-roof samplers.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号