首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于生命周期评价的页岩气开采返排-产出水处理技术选择
引用本文:苏培兴,车智涛,张代钧,卢培利,丁阿强.基于生命周期评价的页岩气开采返排-产出水处理技术选择[J].中国环境科学,2022,42(9):4433-4443.
作者姓名:苏培兴  车智涛  张代钧  卢培利  丁阿强
作者单位:1. 重庆大学, 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室, 重庆 400044;2. 重庆大学环境科学系, 重庆 400044
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2019YFC1805502);中国工程院咨询研究重大项目(2018-2D-CQ-2)
摘    要:为探究页岩气开采废水(即返排-产出水)处理技术对环境生态的影响,针对页岩气开采废水的处理后内部回用以及达标排放两种管理模式,结合生命周期评价的理念,运用Simapro分析工具,创建LCA模型,对典型处理技术进行清单分析,评估处理技术中的资源、能源消耗和环境负荷,量化分析其对人群健康、生态环境质量和资源方面的影响,建立一种页岩气开采返排-产出水处理技术选择的评价方法.同时,以国内某页岩气田产出水处理工程为例,评估所选用处理技术的潜在环境影响.结果表明,内部回用模式下选用的混凝-絮凝处理技术对环境生态影响最小;达标排放模式下针对有机物去除,选用铁电极的电絮凝技术或曝气生物滤池对环境生态的影响较小.对于较低含盐量的开采废水的脱盐,选用的脱盐技术正渗透对环境的影响比反渗透小,但反渗透的脱盐效果更好.对于较高含盐量开采废水的脱盐,选用的多效蒸发-机械蒸汽再压缩技术对环境生态的影响较小.

关 键 词:页岩气  返排-产出水  处理技术  环境影响  生命周期评价  生态风险  
收稿时间:2022-01-12

LCA - assisted selection of shale gas extraction flowback - produced water treatment technologies
SU Pei-xing,CHE Zhi-tao,ZHANG Dai-jun,LU Pei-li,DING A-qiang.LCA - assisted selection of shale gas extraction flowback - produced water treatment technologies[J].China Environmental Science,2022,42(9):4433-4443.
Authors:SU Pei-xing  CHE Zhi-tao  ZHANG Dai-jun  LU Pei-li  DING A-qiang
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;2. Department of Environmental Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China
Abstract:Due to the rapid development of China’s shale gas industry in recent years, it is necessary to evaluate impacts of shale gas extraction wastewater treatments on the environment and ecology. According to the two management modes of internal reuse and discharge after the treatment of wastewater from shale gas extraction (i.e. flowback-produced water (FPW) and the idea of life cycle assessment (LCA)), the Simapro tool was used to conduct inventory analysis of typical treatment technologies. Then a case study of a produced water treatment project in a shale gas field in China was designed to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the selected treatment technology. The results show that the coagulation-flocculation treatment technology used in the internal reuse mode had the least impact on the environment and ecology. For the removal of organic matter in the emission standard mode, the electrocoagulation with iron electrode or biological aerated filter had less impact on the environment and ecology. For desalination of extraction wastewater with low salt content, the ecological environment impact of forward osmosis is lower than that of reverse osmosis, but the desalination effect of reverse osmosis is better. For desalinating salted extraction wastewater, the selected multi-effect evaporation and mechanical vapor recompression technology demonstrated less impact on the environment and ecology.
Keywords:shale gas  flowback-produced water  processing technology  environmental impact  life cycle assessment  ecological risk  
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号