首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

清水塘工业区池塘底泥典型重金属污染特征及其风险评价
引用本文:杨海君,许云海,刘亚宾,伍鹏,舒倩,罗小芳,伍钢. 清水塘工业区池塘底泥典型重金属污染特征及其风险评价[J]. 地球与环境, 2019, 47(5): 671-679
作者姓名:杨海君  许云海  刘亚宾  伍鹏  舒倩  罗小芳  伍钢
作者单位:湖南农业大学植物保护学院,长沙410128;湖南中城环境监测技术有限公司,长沙410128;湖南农业大学植物保护学院,长沙,410128;湖南中城环境监测技术有限公司,长沙,410128
基金项目:湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2018JJ2182)。
摘    要:为查明株洲清水塘工业区池塘底泥重金属污染现状及其变化趋势,揭示池塘底泥重金属对霞湾港与老霞湾港水体及底泥的潜在影响。将区域内25口池塘分别划属S1、S2、S3区,于2017年12月11日在25口池塘采集32份底泥样品,并进行了Pb、Cd、As含量的测定,采用地累积指数(Igeo)与Hakanson潜在生态危害指数(Eir)对底泥中Cd、Pb、As污染与生态风险进行了评价。结果表明:S1、S2、S3区池塘底泥中Cd、Pb、As含量均超过湖南土壤背景值,分别为土壤背景值的657、44、12倍,表明Cd是清水塘工业区池塘底泥中的主要污染物。变异系数结果显示,各采样点底泥中Cd、Pb、As含量分布离散,受点源输入影响大。底泥中Pb、Cd、As的Igeo均值分别为4. 87、8. 78、2. 95,分别处重度、严重、中度污染等级,不同区底泥中重金属Igeo呈S3>S1>S2的分布特征。潜在生态风险评价结果表明,底泥中重金属Eir呈Cd>Pb>As的分布特征,3个区底泥中Cd的Eir为9396~24 617,污染等级均为生态危害很强; Pb的Eir为101~309,S1、S3区污染等级为生态危害强,S2区则为生态危害较强; As的Eir为74~138,S1、S3区污染等级为生态危害较强,S2区则为生态危害中等。清水塘霞湾港和老霞湾港周边区域池塘底泥中Cd、Pb、As污染严重,呈S3>S1>S2分布,应依据3个区域池塘底泥重金属污染程度顺序,采取挖掘底泥、稳定固化、填埋处理等措施。

关 键 词:清水塘  池塘底泥  重金属污染  风险评价
收稿时间:2019-02-16
修稿时间:2019-04-29

Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Qingshuitang Industrial District
YANG Haijun,XU Yunhai,LIU Yabin,WU Peng,SHU Qian,LUO Liaofang,Wu Gang. Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Qingshuitang Industrial District[J]. Earth and Environment, 2019, 47(5): 671-679
Authors:YANG Haijun  XU Yunhai  LIU Yabin  WU Peng  SHU Qian  LUO Liaofang  Wu Gang
Affiliation:1. College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China;2. Environmental Monitoring Technology Limited Company of Hunan Zhongcheng, Changsha 410000, China
Abstract:In order to assess the heavy metal pollution in pond sediments of Xiawan and Laoxiawan ports in the Qingshuitang industrial zone of Zhuzhou, 25 ponds in the study area were divided into three sub-divisions (S1, S2 and S3) and a total of 32 sediment samples were collected on December 11th, 2017, and contents of pH, Pb, Cd and As in sediment samples were measured. The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and the potential ecological risk index (Eri) were used to evaluate the pollution and ecological risk of Cd, Pb and As. The results showed that contents of Cd, Pb and As in sediments of S1, S2 and S3 all exceeded their background soil values of Hunan, and were 657, 44 and 12 folds higher than the background values, respectively, suggesting that Cd was the major pollutant in ponds of the Qingshuitang industrial area. The variation coefficients analyses showed that Cd, Pb and As contents in sediments distributed discretely and were affected greatly by input sources. The Igeo assessment indicated that average Igeo values of Pb, Cd and As in sediments were 4.87, 8.78 and 2.95, respectively, corresponding to severe, serious and moderate pollution levels. The contamination order of sediments by heavy metals was S3 > S1 > S2. Results of the Eri assessment indicated that Eri values of heavy metals in pond sediments followed an order of Cd > Pb > As, Eri values of Cd obtained from 3 sediments were in the range of 9 396-24 617, indicating the extreme strong ecological risk; Eri values of Pb were in the range of 101-309, showed strong ecological risk in S1 and S3 and moderate ecological risk in S2; Eri values of As were in the range of 74-138, showed strong ecological risk in S1 and S3 and moderate ecological risk in S2. In summary, pond sediments around Xiawan and Laoxiawan Ports were polluted seriously by Cd, Pb and As with an order of S3 > S1 > S2. Thus, corresponding treatment measures, such as dredging, stabilizing or landfilling, should be taken according to the pollution levels.
Keywords:sediment  heavy metal pollution  pollution characteristics  risk assessment
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地球与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球与环境》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号