首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Beyond the black box: Forest sector vulnerability assessments and adaptation to climate change in North America
Institution:1. Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States;2. Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B8, Canada;3. Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Way, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada;4. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469C Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 259772, Singapore;1. Medizinische Klinik für Nephrologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany;2. German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, DFKI, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany;3. Averbis GmbH, 79106 Freiburg, Germany;1. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore;2. Harvard Kennedy School, United States;3. National University of Singapore, Singapore;4. Simon Fraser University, Canada;1. São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Bioscience Institute. Pça. Infante D. Henrique, 11330-900, São Vicente, Brazil;2. Marine Sciences Institute, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, 60165-081, Brazil;3. Physical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cádiz, Puerto Real, 11510, Cádiz, Spain;1. Department of Applied Zoology/Animal Ecology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany;2. Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany;3. Department of Scientific Instrumentation and Utilities Management, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany;4. Department of Plant Ecology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany;5. Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Berlin, Germany;6. Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany
Abstract:In the wake of the failures to date of well-publicized multilateral and multi-sectoral mitigation efforts to control greenhouse gases, attention is now increasingly focused on the effectiveness and capacity of national and sub-national level sectoral plans, including forestry, to usher in a new era of adaptation efforts. In Canada, the government of British Columbia spent several years developing its Future Forest Ecosystems Initiative as part of a larger climate change response strategy in the forest sector. Similarly, in the United States, wildfire related events have led to climate change inspired efforts by individual states (e.g., Alaska, California) and the US Forest Service has recently undertaken plans to incorporate climate change considerations in national forest planning beginning with the National Road Map for Responding to Climate Change. This paper highlights a number of shortcomings with both these national and sub-national strategies with respect to the relationships existing between governance, forestry and climate change. It proposes incorporating considerations of governance mechanisms directly into forest sector planning and the need to assess not only natural system level changes but also the extent to which new problems can be dealt with by ‘old’ or ‘new’ governance arrangements.
Keywords:Adaptation  Canada  Climate change  Forestry  United States
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号