Scientific collectives in region-building processes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Geography and Environment, University of Geneva, Uni Mail, 40 Boulevard du Pont-d’Arve, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland;2. Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Uni Rondeau, Site de Battelle – Bâtiment D, 7 route de Drize, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland;1. Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra 2600, ACT, Australia;2. CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship, Hobart 7001, TAS, Australia;3. CSIRO Land and Water Flagship, Based at James Cook University, Townsville 4811, QLD, Australia;1. Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA;2. Department of Geography and Regional Planning, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705, USA;3. Al Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine;4. Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, AZ 85721, USA;1. School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia;2. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia;1. Environmental Science & Management, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, United States;2. Sociology, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, United States;3. US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR 97330, United States;1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Shanghai 200433, China;2. Sustainable Development Coordination Unit, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK;3. Charles University Environment Center, José Martího 2/407, 16200 Prague 6, Czech Republic;1. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Hindenburgufer 66, D-24105 Kiel, Germany;2. Centrum für Europäische Politik, Kaiser-Joseph-Straße 266, D-79098 Freiburg, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | During the last 30 years, growing demand for science-based policy making has contributed to the mobilization of scientific cooperation alongside transnational political arrangements for addressing environmental issues. Following the contemporary trend toward regionalizing environmental policy and practice, many of these scientific joint efforts have focused on a regional scale. This article examines regional scientific cooperation in the context of the institutionalization of mountain regions in Europe. Such cooperation can be observed from the Pyrenees to Central Asia, albeit with a degree of variation that largely remains unexplored in scientific research. Sometimes scientific cooperation served to lay the groundwork of a mountain policy initiative, other times it appeared in its wake; some examples appear as loose networks of individual scientists, others are set up as formalized monitoring and observation centers; finally, some scientific joint efforts are formally linked to, or incorporated in a mountain policy initiative, while others are largely independent. The article proposes a new typology for understanding the interactions between regional scientific mobilization and regional policy making and provides up-to-date portraits of six main cases. |
| |
Keywords: | Science–policy interaction Epistemic community Region-building Mountain regions Europe Central Asia |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|